A comparative evaluation of factors influencing osteoinductivity among scaffolds designed for bone regeneration

Erin L. Hsu, Jason H. Ghodasra, Amruta Ashtekar, Michael S. Nickoli, Sungsoo S. Lee, Samuel I Stupp, Wellington K. Hsu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Due to differing compositions, synthetic scaffolds developed for bone regeneration vary widely in efficacy. To quantify the impact of such differences on osteoinductivity, numerous parameters were examined. Absorbable collagen sponge (ACS), three ceramic-based carriers (#1-3) of varying compositions, mineralized allograft chips, and an experimental phosphoserine-rich nanofiber scaffold [S(P) gel] were compared in their ability to promote cell adhesion, proliferation/survival, growth factor binding/release, and osteogenic gene expression. Human preosteoblasts were found to adhere most efficiently to the S(P) gel, and the growth/survival was greatest on the S(P) and ACS scaffolds, with minimal growth seen on the allograft and Ceramic #3. In bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) binding/release assays, ACS demonstrated a burst release pattern, whereas the allograft and the ceramics inefficiently released BMP-2. The S(P) gel showed the most ideal rates of growth factor binding and release. QPCR analyses showed significant differences in the CXCL12, CXCR4, and RANKL transcripts among the cells grown on these various scaffolds. Although some scaffolds showed an advantage over others in individual parameters, the nanofiber gel appears to provide the optimal balance in the factors important to osteoinductivity evaluated here.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1764-1772
Number of pages9
JournalTissue Engineering - Part A
Volume19
Issue number15-16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1 2013

Fingerprint

Bone Regeneration
Scaffolds
Bone
Ceramics
Porifera
Gels
Collagen
Nanofibers
Allografts
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2
Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
Proteins
Phosphoserine
Survival
Cell adhesion
Scaffolds (biology)
Growth
Chemical analysis
Protein Binding
Gene expression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Bioengineering
  • Biochemistry
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Biomaterials
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A comparative evaluation of factors influencing osteoinductivity among scaffolds designed for bone regeneration. / Hsu, Erin L.; Ghodasra, Jason H.; Ashtekar, Amruta; Nickoli, Michael S.; Lee, Sungsoo S.; Stupp, Samuel I; Hsu, Wellington K.

In: Tissue Engineering - Part A, Vol. 19, No. 15-16, 01.08.2013, p. 1764-1772.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hsu, Erin L. ; Ghodasra, Jason H. ; Ashtekar, Amruta ; Nickoli, Michael S. ; Lee, Sungsoo S. ; Stupp, Samuel I ; Hsu, Wellington K. / A comparative evaluation of factors influencing osteoinductivity among scaffolds designed for bone regeneration. In: Tissue Engineering - Part A. 2013 ; Vol. 19, No. 15-16. pp. 1764-1772.
@article{6e1da33a9d8e41c490d38588b1d23d82,
title = "A comparative evaluation of factors influencing osteoinductivity among scaffolds designed for bone regeneration",
abstract = "Due to differing compositions, synthetic scaffolds developed for bone regeneration vary widely in efficacy. To quantify the impact of such differences on osteoinductivity, numerous parameters were examined. Absorbable collagen sponge (ACS), three ceramic-based carriers (#1-3) of varying compositions, mineralized allograft chips, and an experimental phosphoserine-rich nanofiber scaffold [S(P) gel] were compared in their ability to promote cell adhesion, proliferation/survival, growth factor binding/release, and osteogenic gene expression. Human preosteoblasts were found to adhere most efficiently to the S(P) gel, and the growth/survival was greatest on the S(P) and ACS scaffolds, with minimal growth seen on the allograft and Ceramic #3. In bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) binding/release assays, ACS demonstrated a burst release pattern, whereas the allograft and the ceramics inefficiently released BMP-2. The S(P) gel showed the most ideal rates of growth factor binding and release. QPCR analyses showed significant differences in the CXCL12, CXCR4, and RANKL transcripts among the cells grown on these various scaffolds. Although some scaffolds showed an advantage over others in individual parameters, the nanofiber gel appears to provide the optimal balance in the factors important to osteoinductivity evaluated here.",
author = "Hsu, {Erin L.} and Ghodasra, {Jason H.} and Amruta Ashtekar and Nickoli, {Michael S.} and Lee, {Sungsoo S.} and Stupp, {Samuel I} and Hsu, {Wellington K.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0711",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1764--1772",
journal = "Tissue Engineering - Part A.",
issn = "1937-3341",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "15-16",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative evaluation of factors influencing osteoinductivity among scaffolds designed for bone regeneration

AU - Hsu, Erin L.

AU - Ghodasra, Jason H.

AU - Ashtekar, Amruta

AU - Nickoli, Michael S.

AU - Lee, Sungsoo S.

AU - Stupp, Samuel I

AU - Hsu, Wellington K.

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - Due to differing compositions, synthetic scaffolds developed for bone regeneration vary widely in efficacy. To quantify the impact of such differences on osteoinductivity, numerous parameters were examined. Absorbable collagen sponge (ACS), three ceramic-based carriers (#1-3) of varying compositions, mineralized allograft chips, and an experimental phosphoserine-rich nanofiber scaffold [S(P) gel] were compared in their ability to promote cell adhesion, proliferation/survival, growth factor binding/release, and osteogenic gene expression. Human preosteoblasts were found to adhere most efficiently to the S(P) gel, and the growth/survival was greatest on the S(P) and ACS scaffolds, with minimal growth seen on the allograft and Ceramic #3. In bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) binding/release assays, ACS demonstrated a burst release pattern, whereas the allograft and the ceramics inefficiently released BMP-2. The S(P) gel showed the most ideal rates of growth factor binding and release. QPCR analyses showed significant differences in the CXCL12, CXCR4, and RANKL transcripts among the cells grown on these various scaffolds. Although some scaffolds showed an advantage over others in individual parameters, the nanofiber gel appears to provide the optimal balance in the factors important to osteoinductivity evaluated here.

AB - Due to differing compositions, synthetic scaffolds developed for bone regeneration vary widely in efficacy. To quantify the impact of such differences on osteoinductivity, numerous parameters were examined. Absorbable collagen sponge (ACS), three ceramic-based carriers (#1-3) of varying compositions, mineralized allograft chips, and an experimental phosphoserine-rich nanofiber scaffold [S(P) gel] were compared in their ability to promote cell adhesion, proliferation/survival, growth factor binding/release, and osteogenic gene expression. Human preosteoblasts were found to adhere most efficiently to the S(P) gel, and the growth/survival was greatest on the S(P) and ACS scaffolds, with minimal growth seen on the allograft and Ceramic #3. In bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) binding/release assays, ACS demonstrated a burst release pattern, whereas the allograft and the ceramics inefficiently released BMP-2. The S(P) gel showed the most ideal rates of growth factor binding and release. QPCR analyses showed significant differences in the CXCL12, CXCR4, and RANKL transcripts among the cells grown on these various scaffolds. Although some scaffolds showed an advantage over others in individual parameters, the nanofiber gel appears to provide the optimal balance in the factors important to osteoinductivity evaluated here.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879680565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879680565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0711

DO - 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0711

M3 - Article

C2 - 23521090

AN - SCOPUS:84879680565

VL - 19

SP - 1764

EP - 1772

JO - Tissue Engineering - Part A.

JF - Tissue Engineering - Part A.

SN - 1937-3341

IS - 15-16

ER -