A comparison between flow-through and flow-by porous electrodes for redox energy storage

James A Trainham, John Newman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An economic comparison is made between electrode configurations for flow redox battery applications: (i) the flow-through configuration (current parallel to the fluid flow) and (ii) the flow-by configuration (current perpendicular to the fluid flow). Steady-state computer models are developed for each electrode system. These models are used to predict current density, cell voltage, and power density over a complete cycle (charge and discharge). The economic comparison is made by optimizing each configuration with respect to an objective function appropriate for redox battery applications. Only the variable costs are considered. The results of the optimization show that the flowbby configuration is superior. The flow-through configuration not only yields a lower return on investment, but it is impractical due to a requirement of extremely low flow rates (Re <0.001). Its failure is due to current flow (and ohmic potential drop) in the same direction as the fluid flow.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)455-469
Number of pages15
JournalElectrochimica Acta
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1981

Fingerprint

Energy storage
Flow of fluids
Electrodes
Economics
Current density
Flow rate
Electric potential
Oxidation-Reduction
Costs
Flow batteries
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Electrochemistry

Cite this

A comparison between flow-through and flow-by porous electrodes for redox energy storage. / Trainham, James A; Newman, John.

In: Electrochimica Acta, Vol. 26, No. 4, 1981, p. 455-469.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{15cb1820cb744eae9c67789a515a44c6,
title = "A comparison between flow-through and flow-by porous electrodes for redox energy storage",
abstract = "An economic comparison is made between electrode configurations for flow redox battery applications: (i) the flow-through configuration (current parallel to the fluid flow) and (ii) the flow-by configuration (current perpendicular to the fluid flow). Steady-state computer models are developed for each electrode system. These models are used to predict current density, cell voltage, and power density over a complete cycle (charge and discharge). The economic comparison is made by optimizing each configuration with respect to an objective function appropriate for redox battery applications. Only the variable costs are considered. The results of the optimization show that the flowbby configuration is superior. The flow-through configuration not only yields a lower return on investment, but it is impractical due to a requirement of extremely low flow rates (Re <0.001). Its failure is due to current flow (and ohmic potential drop) in the same direction as the fluid flow.",
author = "Trainham, {James A} and John Newman",
year = "1981",
doi = "10.1016/0013-4686(81)87024-7",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "455--469",
journal = "Electrochimica Acta",
issn = "0013-4686",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison between flow-through and flow-by porous electrodes for redox energy storage

AU - Trainham, James A

AU - Newman, John

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - An economic comparison is made between electrode configurations for flow redox battery applications: (i) the flow-through configuration (current parallel to the fluid flow) and (ii) the flow-by configuration (current perpendicular to the fluid flow). Steady-state computer models are developed for each electrode system. These models are used to predict current density, cell voltage, and power density over a complete cycle (charge and discharge). The economic comparison is made by optimizing each configuration with respect to an objective function appropriate for redox battery applications. Only the variable costs are considered. The results of the optimization show that the flowbby configuration is superior. The flow-through configuration not only yields a lower return on investment, but it is impractical due to a requirement of extremely low flow rates (Re <0.001). Its failure is due to current flow (and ohmic potential drop) in the same direction as the fluid flow.

AB - An economic comparison is made between electrode configurations for flow redox battery applications: (i) the flow-through configuration (current parallel to the fluid flow) and (ii) the flow-by configuration (current perpendicular to the fluid flow). Steady-state computer models are developed for each electrode system. These models are used to predict current density, cell voltage, and power density over a complete cycle (charge and discharge). The economic comparison is made by optimizing each configuration with respect to an objective function appropriate for redox battery applications. Only the variable costs are considered. The results of the optimization show that the flowbby configuration is superior. The flow-through configuration not only yields a lower return on investment, but it is impractical due to a requirement of extremely low flow rates (Re <0.001). Its failure is due to current flow (and ohmic potential drop) in the same direction as the fluid flow.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019556211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019556211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0013-4686(81)87024-7

DO - 10.1016/0013-4686(81)87024-7

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 455

EP - 469

JO - Electrochimica Acta

JF - Electrochimica Acta

SN - 0013-4686

IS - 4

ER -