Addition of ammonia to AlH3 and BH3. Why does only aluminum form 2

1 adducts?

Margaret Czerw, Alan S Goldman, Karsten Krogh-Jespersen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The electronic structures of the mono- and bisammonia adducts EH3NH3 and EH3(NH3)2, E = B and Al, have been investigated using ab initio electronic structure methods. Geometries were optimized at the MP2/cc-pVTZ level. Higher-level correlated methods (MP4(SDTQ), QCISD(T), CCSD(T)), as well as the G2 and CBS-Q methods, were used to obtain accurate bond dissociation energies. The E-N bond dissociation energy (D(e)) is computed near 33 kcal/mol (E = B) and 31 kcal/mol (E = Al), respectively. Whereas the Al-N bond energy pertaining to the second ammonia molecule in AlH3(NH3)2 is 11-12 kcal/mol, only a transition-state structure may be located for the species BH3(NH3)2. We analyze factors which may distinguish Al from B with respect to the formation of stable bisamine adducts. The most significant difference relates to electronegativity and hence the propensity of boron to engage in predominantly covalent bonding, as compared with the bonding of aluminum with ammonia, which shows substantial electrostatic character. Neither steric factors nor the participation of d-orbitals is found to play an important role in differentiating aluminum from boron. The lesser electronegativity of third-row elements appears to be the critical common feature allowing the formation of hypercoordinate complexes of these elements in contrast to their second-row analogues. Consideration of some group 14 analogues and hard/soft acid/base effects supports this view.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)363-369
Number of pages7
JournalInorganic Chemistry
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 24 2000

Fingerprint

Electronegativity
Boron
Aluminum
Ammonia
adducts
Electronic structure
ammonia
aluminum
boron
dissociation
analogs
electronic structure
Electrostatics
Molecules
Acids
Geometry
energy
electrostatics
orbitals
acids

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Inorganic Chemistry

Cite this

Addition of ammonia to AlH3 and BH3. Why does only aluminum form 2 : 1 adducts? / Czerw, Margaret; Goldman, Alan S; Krogh-Jespersen, Karsten.

In: Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 39, No. 2, 24.01.2000, p. 363-369.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Czerw, Margaret ; Goldman, Alan S ; Krogh-Jespersen, Karsten. / Addition of ammonia to AlH3 and BH3. Why does only aluminum form 2 : 1 adducts?. In: Inorganic Chemistry. 2000 ; Vol. 39, No. 2. pp. 363-369.
@article{53c16bed1cc34b10b20d5c5ae28fafb1,
title = "Addition of ammonia to AlH3 and BH3. Why does only aluminum form 2: 1 adducts?",
abstract = "The electronic structures of the mono- and bisammonia adducts EH3NH3 and EH3(NH3)2, E = B and Al, have been investigated using ab initio electronic structure methods. Geometries were optimized at the MP2/cc-pVTZ level. Higher-level correlated methods (MP4(SDTQ), QCISD(T), CCSD(T)), as well as the G2 and CBS-Q methods, were used to obtain accurate bond dissociation energies. The E-N bond dissociation energy (D(e)) is computed near 33 kcal/mol (E = B) and 31 kcal/mol (E = Al), respectively. Whereas the Al-N bond energy pertaining to the second ammonia molecule in AlH3(NH3)2 is 11-12 kcal/mol, only a transition-state structure may be located for the species BH3(NH3)2. We analyze factors which may distinguish Al from B with respect to the formation of stable bisamine adducts. The most significant difference relates to electronegativity and hence the propensity of boron to engage in predominantly covalent bonding, as compared with the bonding of aluminum with ammonia, which shows substantial electrostatic character. Neither steric factors nor the participation of d-orbitals is found to play an important role in differentiating aluminum from boron. The lesser electronegativity of third-row elements appears to be the critical common feature allowing the formation of hypercoordinate complexes of these elements in contrast to their second-row analogues. Consideration of some group 14 analogues and hard/soft acid/base effects supports this view.",
author = "Margaret Czerw and Goldman, {Alan S} and Karsten Krogh-Jespersen",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1021/ic990961i",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "363--369",
journal = "Inorganic Chemistry",
issn = "0020-1669",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Addition of ammonia to AlH3 and BH3. Why does only aluminum form 2

T2 - 1 adducts?

AU - Czerw, Margaret

AU - Goldman, Alan S

AU - Krogh-Jespersen, Karsten

PY - 2000/1/24

Y1 - 2000/1/24

N2 - The electronic structures of the mono- and bisammonia adducts EH3NH3 and EH3(NH3)2, E = B and Al, have been investigated using ab initio electronic structure methods. Geometries were optimized at the MP2/cc-pVTZ level. Higher-level correlated methods (MP4(SDTQ), QCISD(T), CCSD(T)), as well as the G2 and CBS-Q methods, were used to obtain accurate bond dissociation energies. The E-N bond dissociation energy (D(e)) is computed near 33 kcal/mol (E = B) and 31 kcal/mol (E = Al), respectively. Whereas the Al-N bond energy pertaining to the second ammonia molecule in AlH3(NH3)2 is 11-12 kcal/mol, only a transition-state structure may be located for the species BH3(NH3)2. We analyze factors which may distinguish Al from B with respect to the formation of stable bisamine adducts. The most significant difference relates to electronegativity and hence the propensity of boron to engage in predominantly covalent bonding, as compared with the bonding of aluminum with ammonia, which shows substantial electrostatic character. Neither steric factors nor the participation of d-orbitals is found to play an important role in differentiating aluminum from boron. The lesser electronegativity of third-row elements appears to be the critical common feature allowing the formation of hypercoordinate complexes of these elements in contrast to their second-row analogues. Consideration of some group 14 analogues and hard/soft acid/base effects supports this view.

AB - The electronic structures of the mono- and bisammonia adducts EH3NH3 and EH3(NH3)2, E = B and Al, have been investigated using ab initio electronic structure methods. Geometries were optimized at the MP2/cc-pVTZ level. Higher-level correlated methods (MP4(SDTQ), QCISD(T), CCSD(T)), as well as the G2 and CBS-Q methods, were used to obtain accurate bond dissociation energies. The E-N bond dissociation energy (D(e)) is computed near 33 kcal/mol (E = B) and 31 kcal/mol (E = Al), respectively. Whereas the Al-N bond energy pertaining to the second ammonia molecule in AlH3(NH3)2 is 11-12 kcal/mol, only a transition-state structure may be located for the species BH3(NH3)2. We analyze factors which may distinguish Al from B with respect to the formation of stable bisamine adducts. The most significant difference relates to electronegativity and hence the propensity of boron to engage in predominantly covalent bonding, as compared with the bonding of aluminum with ammonia, which shows substantial electrostatic character. Neither steric factors nor the participation of d-orbitals is found to play an important role in differentiating aluminum from boron. The lesser electronegativity of third-row elements appears to be the critical common feature allowing the formation of hypercoordinate complexes of these elements in contrast to their second-row analogues. Consideration of some group 14 analogues and hard/soft acid/base effects supports this view.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034707510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034707510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/ic990961i

DO - 10.1021/ic990961i

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 363

EP - 369

JO - Inorganic Chemistry

JF - Inorganic Chemistry

SN - 0020-1669

IS - 2

ER -