Adiabatic and non-adiabatic dynamics studies of O(1D) + H2 → OH + H

George C Schatz, Lisa A. Pederson, Philip J. Kuntz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents a detailed study of the title reaction, with emphasis on the contribution of excited electronic states, and on coupling between ground and excited states, in the reaction dynamics. Most of the calculations are based on diatomics-in-molecules (DIM) potential energy surfaces and couplings, but to provide calibration we compare adiabatic DIM results for the two lowest surfaces with corresponding results for high quality ab initio surfaces that were developed using the reproducing kernel Hubert space interpolation method. These comparisons indicate that the DIM surfaces are close to being correct, with the most serious deficiencies occurring in the long range behavior of the 1A′ surface (too attractive), and the barrier height of the 1A″ surface (too high). The effect of non-adiabatic coupling has been described using Tully's fewest switches method and the DIM surfaces and couplings. We find that the surface hopping trajectories for collisions starting on the ground (1A′) surface show slightly colder product vibrations and rotations, and less backscattering than the equivalent adiabatic calculations, while the overall integral cross-sections are not significantly changed. For trajectories that start on the 2A′ surface, where reaction cannot occur in the absence of surface hopping, we find that the cross-section is often about half that associated with the 1A″ surface (which has the same collinear barrier but does not require hopping for reaction to occur). Product state distributions on the 2A′ surface are intermediate in character between 1A′ and 1A″.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)357-374
Number of pages18
JournalFaraday Discussions
Volume108
Publication statusPublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Molecules
molecules
Trajectories
trajectories
Potential energy surfaces
Surface reactions
Electronic states
Backscattering
cross sections
Excited states
products
Ground state
surface reactions
Interpolation
interpolation
backscattering
Switches
switches
Calibration
potential energy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

Cite this

Adiabatic and non-adiabatic dynamics studies of O(1D) + H2 → OH + H. / Schatz, George C; Pederson, Lisa A.; Kuntz, Philip J.

In: Faraday Discussions, Vol. 108, 1997, p. 357-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schatz, George C ; Pederson, Lisa A. ; Kuntz, Philip J. / Adiabatic and non-adiabatic dynamics studies of O(1D) + H2 → OH + H. In: Faraday Discussions. 1997 ; Vol. 108. pp. 357-374.
@article{dc85e835420f4a2fa4d63534da67cd55,
title = "Adiabatic and non-adiabatic dynamics studies of O(1D) + H2 → OH + H",
abstract = "This paper presents a detailed study of the title reaction, with emphasis on the contribution of excited electronic states, and on coupling between ground and excited states, in the reaction dynamics. Most of the calculations are based on diatomics-in-molecules (DIM) potential energy surfaces and couplings, but to provide calibration we compare adiabatic DIM results for the two lowest surfaces with corresponding results for high quality ab initio surfaces that were developed using the reproducing kernel Hubert space interpolation method. These comparisons indicate that the DIM surfaces are close to being correct, with the most serious deficiencies occurring in the long range behavior of the 1A′ surface (too attractive), and the barrier height of the 1A″ surface (too high). The effect of non-adiabatic coupling has been described using Tully's fewest switches method and the DIM surfaces and couplings. We find that the surface hopping trajectories for collisions starting on the ground (1A′) surface show slightly colder product vibrations and rotations, and less backscattering than the equivalent adiabatic calculations, while the overall integral cross-sections are not significantly changed. For trajectories that start on the 2A′ surface, where reaction cannot occur in the absence of surface hopping, we find that the cross-section is often about half that associated with the 1A″ surface (which has the same collinear barrier but does not require hopping for reaction to occur). Product state distributions on the 2A′ surface are intermediate in character between 1A′ and 1A″.",
author = "Schatz, {George C} and Pederson, {Lisa A.} and Kuntz, {Philip J.}",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "357--374",
journal = "Faraday Discussions",
issn = "1364-5498",
publisher = "Royal Society of Chemistry",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adiabatic and non-adiabatic dynamics studies of O(1D) + H2 → OH + H

AU - Schatz, George C

AU - Pederson, Lisa A.

AU - Kuntz, Philip J.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - This paper presents a detailed study of the title reaction, with emphasis on the contribution of excited electronic states, and on coupling between ground and excited states, in the reaction dynamics. Most of the calculations are based on diatomics-in-molecules (DIM) potential energy surfaces and couplings, but to provide calibration we compare adiabatic DIM results for the two lowest surfaces with corresponding results for high quality ab initio surfaces that were developed using the reproducing kernel Hubert space interpolation method. These comparisons indicate that the DIM surfaces are close to being correct, with the most serious deficiencies occurring in the long range behavior of the 1A′ surface (too attractive), and the barrier height of the 1A″ surface (too high). The effect of non-adiabatic coupling has been described using Tully's fewest switches method and the DIM surfaces and couplings. We find that the surface hopping trajectories for collisions starting on the ground (1A′) surface show slightly colder product vibrations and rotations, and less backscattering than the equivalent adiabatic calculations, while the overall integral cross-sections are not significantly changed. For trajectories that start on the 2A′ surface, where reaction cannot occur in the absence of surface hopping, we find that the cross-section is often about half that associated with the 1A″ surface (which has the same collinear barrier but does not require hopping for reaction to occur). Product state distributions on the 2A′ surface are intermediate in character between 1A′ and 1A″.

AB - This paper presents a detailed study of the title reaction, with emphasis on the contribution of excited electronic states, and on coupling between ground and excited states, in the reaction dynamics. Most of the calculations are based on diatomics-in-molecules (DIM) potential energy surfaces and couplings, but to provide calibration we compare adiabatic DIM results for the two lowest surfaces with corresponding results for high quality ab initio surfaces that were developed using the reproducing kernel Hubert space interpolation method. These comparisons indicate that the DIM surfaces are close to being correct, with the most serious deficiencies occurring in the long range behavior of the 1A′ surface (too attractive), and the barrier height of the 1A″ surface (too high). The effect of non-adiabatic coupling has been described using Tully's fewest switches method and the DIM surfaces and couplings. We find that the surface hopping trajectories for collisions starting on the ground (1A′) surface show slightly colder product vibrations and rotations, and less backscattering than the equivalent adiabatic calculations, while the overall integral cross-sections are not significantly changed. For trajectories that start on the 2A′ surface, where reaction cannot occur in the absence of surface hopping, we find that the cross-section is often about half that associated with the 1A″ surface (which has the same collinear barrier but does not require hopping for reaction to occur). Product state distributions on the 2A′ surface are intermediate in character between 1A′ and 1A″.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2742512436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2742512436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:2742512436

VL - 108

SP - 357

EP - 374

JO - Faraday Discussions

JF - Faraday Discussions

SN - 1364-5498

ER -