Application of Consistency Criteria to Calculate BET Areas of Micro- and Mesoporous Metal-Organic Frameworks

Diego A. Gómez-Gualdrón, Peyman Z. Moghadam, Joseph T Hupp, Omar K. Farha, Randall Q. Snurr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) can exhibit exceptionally high surface areas, which are experimentally estimated by applying the BET theory to measured nitrogen isotherms. The Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET)-estimated nitrogen monolayer loading is thus converted to a "BET area," but the meaning of MOF BET areas remains under debate. Recent emphasis has been placed on the usage of four so-called "BET consistency criteria." Using these criteria and simulated nitrogen isotherms for perfect crystals, we calculated BET areas for graphene and 25 MOFs having different pore-size distributions. BET areas were compared with their corresponding geometrically calculated, nitrogen-accessible surface areas (NASAs). Analysis of simulation snapshots elucidated the contributions of "pore-filling" and "monolayer-formation" to the nitrogen adsorption loadings in different MOF pores, revealing the origin of inaccuracies in BET-calculated monolayer loadings, which largely explain discrepancies between BET areas and NASAs. We also find that even if all consistency criteria are satisfied, the BET calculation can significantly overestimate the true monolayer loading, especially in MOFs combining mesopores (d ≥ 20 Å) and large micropores (d = 10-20 Å), due to the overlap of pore-filling and monolayer-formation regimes of these two kinds of pores. While it is not always possible to satisfy all consistency criteria, it is critical to minimize the deviation from these criteria during BET range selection to consistently compare BET areas of different MOFs and for comparing simulated and experimental BET areas of a given MOF. To accurately assess the quality of a MOF sample, it is best to compare experimental BET areas with simulated BET areas rather than with calculated NASAs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-224
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American Chemical Society
Volume138
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 13 2016

Fingerprint

Metals
Nitrogen
Monolayers
Isotherms
Graphite
Graphene
Adsorption
Pore size
Crystals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Catalysis
  • Biochemistry
  • Colloid and Surface Chemistry

Cite this

Application of Consistency Criteria to Calculate BET Areas of Micro- and Mesoporous Metal-Organic Frameworks. / Gómez-Gualdrón, Diego A.; Moghadam, Peyman Z.; Hupp, Joseph T; Farha, Omar K.; Snurr, Randall Q.

In: Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 138, No. 1, 13.01.2016, p. 215-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gómez-Gualdrón, Diego A. ; Moghadam, Peyman Z. ; Hupp, Joseph T ; Farha, Omar K. ; Snurr, Randall Q. / Application of Consistency Criteria to Calculate BET Areas of Micro- and Mesoporous Metal-Organic Frameworks. In: Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2016 ; Vol. 138, No. 1. pp. 215-224.
@article{789a85d5980547a180b2e432ab0c2bda,
title = "Application of Consistency Criteria to Calculate BET Areas of Micro- and Mesoporous Metal-Organic Frameworks",
abstract = "Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) can exhibit exceptionally high surface areas, which are experimentally estimated by applying the BET theory to measured nitrogen isotherms. The Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET)-estimated nitrogen monolayer loading is thus converted to a {"}BET area,{"} but the meaning of MOF BET areas remains under debate. Recent emphasis has been placed on the usage of four so-called {"}BET consistency criteria.{"} Using these criteria and simulated nitrogen isotherms for perfect crystals, we calculated BET areas for graphene and 25 MOFs having different pore-size distributions. BET areas were compared with their corresponding geometrically calculated, nitrogen-accessible surface areas (NASAs). Analysis of simulation snapshots elucidated the contributions of {"}pore-filling{"} and {"}monolayer-formation{"} to the nitrogen adsorption loadings in different MOF pores, revealing the origin of inaccuracies in BET-calculated monolayer loadings, which largely explain discrepancies between BET areas and NASAs. We also find that even if all consistency criteria are satisfied, the BET calculation can significantly overestimate the true monolayer loading, especially in MOFs combining mesopores (d ≥ 20 {\AA}) and large micropores (d = 10-20 {\AA}), due to the overlap of pore-filling and monolayer-formation regimes of these two kinds of pores. While it is not always possible to satisfy all consistency criteria, it is critical to minimize the deviation from these criteria during BET range selection to consistently compare BET areas of different MOFs and for comparing simulated and experimental BET areas of a given MOF. To accurately assess the quality of a MOF sample, it is best to compare experimental BET areas with simulated BET areas rather than with calculated NASAs.",
author = "G{\'o}mez-Gualdr{\'o}n, {Diego A.} and Moghadam, {Peyman Z.} and Hupp, {Joseph T} and Farha, {Omar K.} and Snurr, {Randall Q.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1021/jacs.5b10266",
language = "English",
volume = "138",
pages = "215--224",
journal = "Journal of the American Chemical Society",
issn = "0002-7863",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application of Consistency Criteria to Calculate BET Areas of Micro- and Mesoporous Metal-Organic Frameworks

AU - Gómez-Gualdrón, Diego A.

AU - Moghadam, Peyman Z.

AU - Hupp, Joseph T

AU - Farha, Omar K.

AU - Snurr, Randall Q.

PY - 2016/1/13

Y1 - 2016/1/13

N2 - Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) can exhibit exceptionally high surface areas, which are experimentally estimated by applying the BET theory to measured nitrogen isotherms. The Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET)-estimated nitrogen monolayer loading is thus converted to a "BET area," but the meaning of MOF BET areas remains under debate. Recent emphasis has been placed on the usage of four so-called "BET consistency criteria." Using these criteria and simulated nitrogen isotherms for perfect crystals, we calculated BET areas for graphene and 25 MOFs having different pore-size distributions. BET areas were compared with their corresponding geometrically calculated, nitrogen-accessible surface areas (NASAs). Analysis of simulation snapshots elucidated the contributions of "pore-filling" and "monolayer-formation" to the nitrogen adsorption loadings in different MOF pores, revealing the origin of inaccuracies in BET-calculated monolayer loadings, which largely explain discrepancies between BET areas and NASAs. We also find that even if all consistency criteria are satisfied, the BET calculation can significantly overestimate the true monolayer loading, especially in MOFs combining mesopores (d ≥ 20 Å) and large micropores (d = 10-20 Å), due to the overlap of pore-filling and monolayer-formation regimes of these two kinds of pores. While it is not always possible to satisfy all consistency criteria, it is critical to minimize the deviation from these criteria during BET range selection to consistently compare BET areas of different MOFs and for comparing simulated and experimental BET areas of a given MOF. To accurately assess the quality of a MOF sample, it is best to compare experimental BET areas with simulated BET areas rather than with calculated NASAs.

AB - Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) can exhibit exceptionally high surface areas, which are experimentally estimated by applying the BET theory to measured nitrogen isotherms. The Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET)-estimated nitrogen monolayer loading is thus converted to a "BET area," but the meaning of MOF BET areas remains under debate. Recent emphasis has been placed on the usage of four so-called "BET consistency criteria." Using these criteria and simulated nitrogen isotherms for perfect crystals, we calculated BET areas for graphene and 25 MOFs having different pore-size distributions. BET areas were compared with their corresponding geometrically calculated, nitrogen-accessible surface areas (NASAs). Analysis of simulation snapshots elucidated the contributions of "pore-filling" and "monolayer-formation" to the nitrogen adsorption loadings in different MOF pores, revealing the origin of inaccuracies in BET-calculated monolayer loadings, which largely explain discrepancies between BET areas and NASAs. We also find that even if all consistency criteria are satisfied, the BET calculation can significantly overestimate the true monolayer loading, especially in MOFs combining mesopores (d ≥ 20 Å) and large micropores (d = 10-20 Å), due to the overlap of pore-filling and monolayer-formation regimes of these two kinds of pores. While it is not always possible to satisfy all consistency criteria, it is critical to minimize the deviation from these criteria during BET range selection to consistently compare BET areas of different MOFs and for comparing simulated and experimental BET areas of a given MOF. To accurately assess the quality of a MOF sample, it is best to compare experimental BET areas with simulated BET areas rather than with calculated NASAs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954350430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954350430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/jacs.5b10266

DO - 10.1021/jacs.5b10266

M3 - Article

VL - 138

SP - 215

EP - 224

JO - Journal of the American Chemical Society

JF - Journal of the American Chemical Society

SN - 0002-7863

IS - 1

ER -