Assessing the need for nanotechnology education reform in the United States

Edward T. Foley, Mark C Hersam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Historically, the U.S. has been the global leader in the development of nanotechnologies that are widely believed to be the foundation of the next industrial revolution. However, unless fundamental changes are made in the educational infrastructure in the U.S. to reverse the general erosion of science, technology, engineering, and math ("STEM") education, and to address the specific growing need for a robust nanotechnology workforce, current trends in the global demographic of the high-technology talent pool and R&D infrastructure will lead to a shift in the global dominance in science, technology, and engineering from the U.S. to Asia. For the U.S. to reverse these trends and thus maintain its technological and economic leadership, the infrastructure for nanotechnology education needs to be significantly enhanced. In particular, this infrastructure should include educational models and curricula that will institutionalize an interdisciplinary education, thus exposing students to the connections between disciplines and their relationship to nanotechnology at all levels. The future nanotechnology workforce will also require an increased role for demographic groups that have historically been underrepresented in STEM related fields. Nanotechnology research universities are positioned to play an important role in initiating this educational reform. While programs in nanotechnology are currently being developed for the K-16 level and the general public, significantly more effort is needed to develop effective and comprehensive nanotechnology education reform.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)467-484
Number of pages18
JournalNanotechnology Law and Business
Volume3
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint

nanotechnology
Nanotechnology
Education
reform
education
infrastructure
engineering
industrial revolution
Education reform
high technology
Engineering technology
educational reform
trend
science
Curricula
erosion
Erosion
leadership
leader
Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Engineering (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Assessing the need for nanotechnology education reform in the United States. / Foley, Edward T.; Hersam, Mark C.

In: Nanotechnology Law and Business, Vol. 3, No. 4, 12.2006, p. 467-484.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9da09ed38eaf47779cd193f20b01db58,
title = "Assessing the need for nanotechnology education reform in the United States",
abstract = "Historically, the U.S. has been the global leader in the development of nanotechnologies that are widely believed to be the foundation of the next industrial revolution. However, unless fundamental changes are made in the educational infrastructure in the U.S. to reverse the general erosion of science, technology, engineering, and math ({"}STEM{"}) education, and to address the specific growing need for a robust nanotechnology workforce, current trends in the global demographic of the high-technology talent pool and R&D infrastructure will lead to a shift in the global dominance in science, technology, and engineering from the U.S. to Asia. For the U.S. to reverse these trends and thus maintain its technological and economic leadership, the infrastructure for nanotechnology education needs to be significantly enhanced. In particular, this infrastructure should include educational models and curricula that will institutionalize an interdisciplinary education, thus exposing students to the connections between disciplines and their relationship to nanotechnology at all levels. The future nanotechnology workforce will also require an increased role for demographic groups that have historically been underrepresented in STEM related fields. Nanotechnology research universities are positioned to play an important role in initiating this educational reform. While programs in nanotechnology are currently being developed for the K-16 level and the general public, significantly more effort is needed to develop effective and comprehensive nanotechnology education reform.",
author = "Foley, {Edward T.} and Hersam, {Mark C}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "467--484",
journal = "Nanotechnology Law and Business",
issn = "1546-2080",
publisher = "Nanotechnology Law and Business",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the need for nanotechnology education reform in the United States

AU - Foley, Edward T.

AU - Hersam, Mark C

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - Historically, the U.S. has been the global leader in the development of nanotechnologies that are widely believed to be the foundation of the next industrial revolution. However, unless fundamental changes are made in the educational infrastructure in the U.S. to reverse the general erosion of science, technology, engineering, and math ("STEM") education, and to address the specific growing need for a robust nanotechnology workforce, current trends in the global demographic of the high-technology talent pool and R&D infrastructure will lead to a shift in the global dominance in science, technology, and engineering from the U.S. to Asia. For the U.S. to reverse these trends and thus maintain its technological and economic leadership, the infrastructure for nanotechnology education needs to be significantly enhanced. In particular, this infrastructure should include educational models and curricula that will institutionalize an interdisciplinary education, thus exposing students to the connections between disciplines and their relationship to nanotechnology at all levels. The future nanotechnology workforce will also require an increased role for demographic groups that have historically been underrepresented in STEM related fields. Nanotechnology research universities are positioned to play an important role in initiating this educational reform. While programs in nanotechnology are currently being developed for the K-16 level and the general public, significantly more effort is needed to develop effective and comprehensive nanotechnology education reform.

AB - Historically, the U.S. has been the global leader in the development of nanotechnologies that are widely believed to be the foundation of the next industrial revolution. However, unless fundamental changes are made in the educational infrastructure in the U.S. to reverse the general erosion of science, technology, engineering, and math ("STEM") education, and to address the specific growing need for a robust nanotechnology workforce, current trends in the global demographic of the high-technology talent pool and R&D infrastructure will lead to a shift in the global dominance in science, technology, and engineering from the U.S. to Asia. For the U.S. to reverse these trends and thus maintain its technological and economic leadership, the infrastructure for nanotechnology education needs to be significantly enhanced. In particular, this infrastructure should include educational models and curricula that will institutionalize an interdisciplinary education, thus exposing students to the connections between disciplines and their relationship to nanotechnology at all levels. The future nanotechnology workforce will also require an increased role for demographic groups that have historically been underrepresented in STEM related fields. Nanotechnology research universities are positioned to play an important role in initiating this educational reform. While programs in nanotechnology are currently being developed for the K-16 level and the general public, significantly more effort is needed to develop effective and comprehensive nanotechnology education reform.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34848871894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34848871894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 467

EP - 484

JO - Nanotechnology Law and Business

JF - Nanotechnology Law and Business

SN - 1546-2080

IS - 4

ER -