Calculation of the crystalline field strength: Chrome alum

Arthur J Freeman, R. E. Watson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A calculation of the crystalline field strength, Dq, is reported for the case of chrome alum, using the same model and crystal field potential employed by Kleiner and recently determined Hartree-Fock wave functions for the Cr+3 ion. On this basis, earlier theoretical attempts at determining, within the framework of crystal field theory, accurate Dq values are reviewed and analyzed. Particular emphasis is placed on a consideration of reported point charge calculations and Phillips' method of including the effects of orthogonalization of ligand to metal ion wave functions. Our results indicate that the point charge model estimates for Dq gave good results mostly because they were based on the use of improper 3d wave functions for the transition metal cation. Kleiner's result is significantly improvedhis wrong sign for Dq is reversed and a small positive Dq is obtainedbut in such a way as to contradict Phillips conclusions. A discussion is given of the various evidence for the inadequacy of the electrostatic potential theory and some of the necessary modifications are indicated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1254-1260
Number of pages7
JournalPhysical Review
Volume120
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1960

Fingerprint

alum
chromium
field strength
wave functions
crystal field theory
potential theory
metal ions
transition metals
electrostatics
cations
ligands
estimates
ions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Calculation of the crystalline field strength : Chrome alum. / Freeman, Arthur J; Watson, R. E.

In: Physical Review, Vol. 120, No. 4, 1960, p. 1254-1260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Freeman, Arthur J ; Watson, R. E. / Calculation of the crystalline field strength : Chrome alum. In: Physical Review. 1960 ; Vol. 120, No. 4. pp. 1254-1260.
@article{18437f46c30743919487dd930743efcc,
title = "Calculation of the crystalline field strength: Chrome alum",
abstract = "A calculation of the crystalline field strength, Dq, is reported for the case of chrome alum, using the same model and crystal field potential employed by Kleiner and recently determined Hartree-Fock wave functions for the Cr+3 ion. On this basis, earlier theoretical attempts at determining, within the framework of crystal field theory, accurate Dq values are reviewed and analyzed. Particular emphasis is placed on a consideration of reported point charge calculations and Phillips' method of including the effects of orthogonalization of ligand to metal ion wave functions. Our results indicate that the point charge model estimates for Dq gave good results mostly because they were based on the use of improper 3d wave functions for the transition metal cation. Kleiner's result is significantly improvedhis wrong sign for Dq is reversed and a small positive Dq is obtainedbut in such a way as to contradict Phillips conclusions. A discussion is given of the various evidence for the inadequacy of the electrostatic potential theory and some of the necessary modifications are indicated.",
author = "Freeman, {Arthur J} and Watson, {R. E.}",
year = "1960",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRev.120.1254",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
pages = "1254--1260",
journal = "Physical Review",
issn = "0031-899X",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Calculation of the crystalline field strength

T2 - Chrome alum

AU - Freeman, Arthur J

AU - Watson, R. E.

PY - 1960

Y1 - 1960

N2 - A calculation of the crystalline field strength, Dq, is reported for the case of chrome alum, using the same model and crystal field potential employed by Kleiner and recently determined Hartree-Fock wave functions for the Cr+3 ion. On this basis, earlier theoretical attempts at determining, within the framework of crystal field theory, accurate Dq values are reviewed and analyzed. Particular emphasis is placed on a consideration of reported point charge calculations and Phillips' method of including the effects of orthogonalization of ligand to metal ion wave functions. Our results indicate that the point charge model estimates for Dq gave good results mostly because they were based on the use of improper 3d wave functions for the transition metal cation. Kleiner's result is significantly improvedhis wrong sign for Dq is reversed and a small positive Dq is obtainedbut in such a way as to contradict Phillips conclusions. A discussion is given of the various evidence for the inadequacy of the electrostatic potential theory and some of the necessary modifications are indicated.

AB - A calculation of the crystalline field strength, Dq, is reported for the case of chrome alum, using the same model and crystal field potential employed by Kleiner and recently determined Hartree-Fock wave functions for the Cr+3 ion. On this basis, earlier theoretical attempts at determining, within the framework of crystal field theory, accurate Dq values are reviewed and analyzed. Particular emphasis is placed on a consideration of reported point charge calculations and Phillips' method of including the effects of orthogonalization of ligand to metal ion wave functions. Our results indicate that the point charge model estimates for Dq gave good results mostly because they were based on the use of improper 3d wave functions for the transition metal cation. Kleiner's result is significantly improvedhis wrong sign for Dq is reversed and a small positive Dq is obtainedbut in such a way as to contradict Phillips conclusions. A discussion is given of the various evidence for the inadequacy of the electrostatic potential theory and some of the necessary modifications are indicated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344026955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344026955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRev.120.1254

DO - 10.1103/PhysRev.120.1254

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0344026955

VL - 120

SP - 1254

EP - 1260

JO - Physical Review

JF - Physical Review

SN - 0031-899X

IS - 4

ER -