Comparison of average-potential models and binary-collision models of axial channeling and blocking

J. U. Andersen, Leonard C Feldman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A comparison is made of three types of calculations of the axial "channeling dip": the large decrease in yield of close-encounter processes for energetic ions incident on a single crystal parallel to a low-index direction. The models, indicated as (1) the binary-collision model, (2) the halfway-plane model, and (3) the continuum model, are used to calculate the dip for two standard cases corresponding to recent experiments. The methods are compared as to treatment of potential and treatment of thermal vibrations. The ease of calculation versus quantitative accuracy for the different methods is discussed, and finally the agreement with experimental results is briefly reviewed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2063-2069
Number of pages7
JournalPhysical Review B
Volume1
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1970

Fingerprint

collisions
encounters
Single crystals
Ions
continuums
vibration
single crystals
ions
Experiments
Hot Temperature
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Condensed Matter Physics

Cite this

Comparison of average-potential models and binary-collision models of axial channeling and blocking. / Andersen, J. U.; Feldman, Leonard C.

In: Physical Review B, Vol. 1, No. 5, 1970, p. 2063-2069.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e8ff7c2cc3384be8b48f3ace458801e3,
title = "Comparison of average-potential models and binary-collision models of axial channeling and blocking",
abstract = "A comparison is made of three types of calculations of the axial {"}channeling dip{"}: the large decrease in yield of close-encounter processes for energetic ions incident on a single crystal parallel to a low-index direction. The models, indicated as (1) the binary-collision model, (2) the halfway-plane model, and (3) the continuum model, are used to calculate the dip for two standard cases corresponding to recent experiments. The methods are compared as to treatment of potential and treatment of thermal vibrations. The ease of calculation versus quantitative accuracy for the different methods is discussed, and finally the agreement with experimental results is briefly reviewed.",
author = "Andersen, {J. U.} and Feldman, {Leonard C}",
year = "1970",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevB.1.2063",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "2063--2069",
journal = "Physical Review B-Condensed Matter",
issn = "1098-0121",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of average-potential models and binary-collision models of axial channeling and blocking

AU - Andersen, J. U.

AU - Feldman, Leonard C

PY - 1970

Y1 - 1970

N2 - A comparison is made of three types of calculations of the axial "channeling dip": the large decrease in yield of close-encounter processes for energetic ions incident on a single crystal parallel to a low-index direction. The models, indicated as (1) the binary-collision model, (2) the halfway-plane model, and (3) the continuum model, are used to calculate the dip for two standard cases corresponding to recent experiments. The methods are compared as to treatment of potential and treatment of thermal vibrations. The ease of calculation versus quantitative accuracy for the different methods is discussed, and finally the agreement with experimental results is briefly reviewed.

AB - A comparison is made of three types of calculations of the axial "channeling dip": the large decrease in yield of close-encounter processes for energetic ions incident on a single crystal parallel to a low-index direction. The models, indicated as (1) the binary-collision model, (2) the halfway-plane model, and (3) the continuum model, are used to calculate the dip for two standard cases corresponding to recent experiments. The methods are compared as to treatment of potential and treatment of thermal vibrations. The ease of calculation versus quantitative accuracy for the different methods is discussed, and finally the agreement with experimental results is briefly reviewed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0039953775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0039953775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevB.1.2063

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevB.1.2063

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 2063

EP - 2069

JO - Physical Review B-Condensed Matter

JF - Physical Review B-Condensed Matter

SN - 1098-0121

IS - 5

ER -