Comparison of energy efficiency incentive programs

Rebates and white certificates

Morghan Transue, Frank Felder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With increased interest in energy efficiency in recent years, energy efficiency portfolio standards (EEPS) have gained popularity in state policymaking. This analysis employed New Jersey specific data to compare two incentive based approaches to EEPS implementation: rebates and white certificates. Quantitative modeling suggests that white certificate approaches that depend on market-clearing prices generate much larger upfront incentive outlays than rebate programs. They do not however increase societal burden. Both programs overcome high upfront efficiency measure costs and both recoup the expenses over the long run. Administration costs and participation rates can affect this dynamic however and require additional research to determine which approaches are most cost effective for various energy efficiency measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-111
Number of pages9
JournalUtilities Policy
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

energy efficiency
certification
incentive
energy
efficiency
cost
costs
market price
popularity
market
comparison
programme
Rebates
Incentives
Energy efficiency
participation
modeling
Efficiency measures
Costs

Keywords

  • Energy efficiency
  • Rebates
  • White tags

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Development
  • Law
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Comparison of energy efficiency incentive programs : Rebates and white certificates. / Transue, Morghan; Felder, Frank.

In: Utilities Policy, Vol. 18, No. 2, 06.2010, p. 103-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{92ebd94822b1462094a5fd05446c9e86,
title = "Comparison of energy efficiency incentive programs: Rebates and white certificates",
abstract = "With increased interest in energy efficiency in recent years, energy efficiency portfolio standards (EEPS) have gained popularity in state policymaking. This analysis employed New Jersey specific data to compare two incentive based approaches to EEPS implementation: rebates and white certificates. Quantitative modeling suggests that white certificate approaches that depend on market-clearing prices generate much larger upfront incentive outlays than rebate programs. They do not however increase societal burden. Both programs overcome high upfront efficiency measure costs and both recoup the expenses over the long run. Administration costs and participation rates can affect this dynamic however and require additional research to determine which approaches are most cost effective for various energy efficiency measures.",
keywords = "Energy efficiency, Rebates, White tags",
author = "Morghan Transue and Frank Felder",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jup.2009.12.003",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "103--111",
journal = "Utilities Policy",
issn = "0957-1787",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of energy efficiency incentive programs

T2 - Rebates and white certificates

AU - Transue, Morghan

AU - Felder, Frank

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - With increased interest in energy efficiency in recent years, energy efficiency portfolio standards (EEPS) have gained popularity in state policymaking. This analysis employed New Jersey specific data to compare two incentive based approaches to EEPS implementation: rebates and white certificates. Quantitative modeling suggests that white certificate approaches that depend on market-clearing prices generate much larger upfront incentive outlays than rebate programs. They do not however increase societal burden. Both programs overcome high upfront efficiency measure costs and both recoup the expenses over the long run. Administration costs and participation rates can affect this dynamic however and require additional research to determine which approaches are most cost effective for various energy efficiency measures.

AB - With increased interest in energy efficiency in recent years, energy efficiency portfolio standards (EEPS) have gained popularity in state policymaking. This analysis employed New Jersey specific data to compare two incentive based approaches to EEPS implementation: rebates and white certificates. Quantitative modeling suggests that white certificate approaches that depend on market-clearing prices generate much larger upfront incentive outlays than rebate programs. They do not however increase societal burden. Both programs overcome high upfront efficiency measure costs and both recoup the expenses over the long run. Administration costs and participation rates can affect this dynamic however and require additional research to determine which approaches are most cost effective for various energy efficiency measures.

KW - Energy efficiency

KW - Rebates

KW - White tags

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952581063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952581063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jup.2009.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jup.2009.12.003

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 103

EP - 111

JO - Utilities Policy

JF - Utilities Policy

SN - 0957-1787

IS - 2

ER -