Comparison of interfacial electron transfer through carboxylate and phosphonate anchoring groups

Chunxing She, Jianchang Guo, Stephan Irle, Kejji Morokuma, Debra L. Mohler, Herve Zabri, Fabrice Odobel, Kyoung Tae Youm, Fang Liu, Joseph T Hupp, Tianquan Lian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effects of anchoring groups on electron injection from adsorbate to nanocrystalline thin films were investigated by comparing injection kinetics through carboxylate versus phosphonate groups to TiO 2 and SnO 2. In the first pair of molecules, Re(L A)(CO) 3Cl (ReC1A) and Re(Lp)(CO)3Cl (ReC1P), [L A = 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-bis-CH 2-COOH, Lp= 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-bis-CH 2-PO 3H 2], the anchoring groups were insulated from the bipyridine ligand by a CH 2 group. In the second pair of molecules, Ru(dcbpyH 2) 2(NCS) 2 (RuN3) and Ru(bpbpyH 2) 2(NCS) 2 (RuN3P), [dcbpy = 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-biscarboxylic acid, bpbpy = 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-bisphosphonic acid], the anchoring groups were directly connected to the bipyridine ligands. The injection kinetics, as measured by subpicosecond IR absorption spectroscopy, showed that electron injection rates from ReC1P to both TiO 2 and SnO 2 were faster than those from ReC1A. The injection rates from RuN3 and RuN3P to SnO 2 films were similar. On TiO 2, the injection kinetics from RuN3 and RuN3P were biphasic: carboxylate group enhances the rate of the <100 fs component, but reduces the rate of the slower components. To provide insight into the effect of the anchoring groups, the electronic structures of Re-bipyridyl-Ti model clusters containing carboxylate and phosphonate anchoring groups and with and without a CH 2 spacer were computed using density functional theory. With the CH 2 spacer, die phosphonate group led to a stronger electronic coupling between bpy and Ti center than the carboxylate group, which accounted for the faster injection from ReC1P than ReC1A. When the anchoring groups were directly connected to the bpy ligand without the CH 2 spacer, such as in RuN3 and RuN3P, their effects were 2-fold: the carboxylate group enhanced the electronic coupling of bpy π* with TiO 2 and lowered the energy of the bpy orbital. How these competing factors led to different effects on TiO 2 and SnO 2 and on different components of the biphasic injection kinetics were discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6832-6842
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Physical Chemistry A
Volume111
Issue number29
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 26 2007

Fingerprint

Organophosphonates
carboxylates
electron transfer
Electron injection
Kinetics
Electrons
Carbon Monoxide
Ligands
injection
methylidyne
2,2'-Dipyridyl
Molecules
Acids
Adsorbates
Absorption spectroscopy
spacers
Electronic structure
Density functional theory
Infrared spectroscopy
kinetics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

Cite this

She, C., Guo, J., Irle, S., Morokuma, K., Mohler, D. L., Zabri, H., ... Lian, T. (2007). Comparison of interfacial electron transfer through carboxylate and phosphonate anchoring groups. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 111(29), 6832-6842. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0709003

Comparison of interfacial electron transfer through carboxylate and phosphonate anchoring groups. / She, Chunxing; Guo, Jianchang; Irle, Stephan; Morokuma, Kejji; Mohler, Debra L.; Zabri, Herve; Odobel, Fabrice; Youm, Kyoung Tae; Liu, Fang; Hupp, Joseph T; Lian, Tianquan.

In: Journal of Physical Chemistry A, Vol. 111, No. 29, 26.07.2007, p. 6832-6842.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

She, C, Guo, J, Irle, S, Morokuma, K, Mohler, DL, Zabri, H, Odobel, F, Youm, KT, Liu, F, Hupp, JT & Lian, T 2007, 'Comparison of interfacial electron transfer through carboxylate and phosphonate anchoring groups', Journal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 111, no. 29, pp. 6832-6842. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0709003
She, Chunxing ; Guo, Jianchang ; Irle, Stephan ; Morokuma, Kejji ; Mohler, Debra L. ; Zabri, Herve ; Odobel, Fabrice ; Youm, Kyoung Tae ; Liu, Fang ; Hupp, Joseph T ; Lian, Tianquan. / Comparison of interfacial electron transfer through carboxylate and phosphonate anchoring groups. In: Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2007 ; Vol. 111, No. 29. pp. 6832-6842.
@article{a05aed71490f4b5d9f23661ccb46909c,
title = "Comparison of interfacial electron transfer through carboxylate and phosphonate anchoring groups",
abstract = "The effects of anchoring groups on electron injection from adsorbate to nanocrystalline thin films were investigated by comparing injection kinetics through carboxylate versus phosphonate groups to TiO 2 and SnO 2. In the first pair of molecules, Re(L A)(CO) 3Cl (ReC1A) and Re(Lp)(CO)3Cl (ReC1P), [L A = 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-bis-CH 2-COOH, Lp= 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-bis-CH 2-PO 3H 2], the anchoring groups were insulated from the bipyridine ligand by a CH 2 group. In the second pair of molecules, Ru(dcbpyH 2) 2(NCS) 2 (RuN3) and Ru(bpbpyH 2) 2(NCS) 2 (RuN3P), [dcbpy = 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-biscarboxylic acid, bpbpy = 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-bisphosphonic acid], the anchoring groups were directly connected to the bipyridine ligands. The injection kinetics, as measured by subpicosecond IR absorption spectroscopy, showed that electron injection rates from ReC1P to both TiO 2 and SnO 2 were faster than those from ReC1A. The injection rates from RuN3 and RuN3P to SnO 2 films were similar. On TiO 2, the injection kinetics from RuN3 and RuN3P were biphasic: carboxylate group enhances the rate of the <100 fs component, but reduces the rate of the slower components. To provide insight into the effect of the anchoring groups, the electronic structures of Re-bipyridyl-Ti model clusters containing carboxylate and phosphonate anchoring groups and with and without a CH 2 spacer were computed using density functional theory. With the CH 2 spacer, die phosphonate group led to a stronger electronic coupling between bpy and Ti center than the carboxylate group, which accounted for the faster injection from ReC1P than ReC1A. When the anchoring groups were directly connected to the bpy ligand without the CH 2 spacer, such as in RuN3 and RuN3P, their effects were 2-fold: the carboxylate group enhanced the electronic coupling of bpy π* with TiO 2 and lowered the energy of the bpy orbital. How these competing factors led to different effects on TiO 2 and SnO 2 and on different components of the biphasic injection kinetics were discussed.",
author = "Chunxing She and Jianchang Guo and Stephan Irle and Kejji Morokuma and Mohler, {Debra L.} and Herve Zabri and Fabrice Odobel and Youm, {Kyoung Tae} and Fang Liu and Hupp, {Joseph T} and Tianquan Lian",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1021/jp0709003",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "6832--6842",
journal = "Journal of Physical Chemistry A",
issn = "1089-5639",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "29",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of interfacial electron transfer through carboxylate and phosphonate anchoring groups

AU - She, Chunxing

AU - Guo, Jianchang

AU - Irle, Stephan

AU - Morokuma, Kejji

AU - Mohler, Debra L.

AU - Zabri, Herve

AU - Odobel, Fabrice

AU - Youm, Kyoung Tae

AU - Liu, Fang

AU - Hupp, Joseph T

AU - Lian, Tianquan

PY - 2007/7/26

Y1 - 2007/7/26

N2 - The effects of anchoring groups on electron injection from adsorbate to nanocrystalline thin films were investigated by comparing injection kinetics through carboxylate versus phosphonate groups to TiO 2 and SnO 2. In the first pair of molecules, Re(L A)(CO) 3Cl (ReC1A) and Re(Lp)(CO)3Cl (ReC1P), [L A = 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-bis-CH 2-COOH, Lp= 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-bis-CH 2-PO 3H 2], the anchoring groups were insulated from the bipyridine ligand by a CH 2 group. In the second pair of molecules, Ru(dcbpyH 2) 2(NCS) 2 (RuN3) and Ru(bpbpyH 2) 2(NCS) 2 (RuN3P), [dcbpy = 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-biscarboxylic acid, bpbpy = 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-bisphosphonic acid], the anchoring groups were directly connected to the bipyridine ligands. The injection kinetics, as measured by subpicosecond IR absorption spectroscopy, showed that electron injection rates from ReC1P to both TiO 2 and SnO 2 were faster than those from ReC1A. The injection rates from RuN3 and RuN3P to SnO 2 films were similar. On TiO 2, the injection kinetics from RuN3 and RuN3P were biphasic: carboxylate group enhances the rate of the <100 fs component, but reduces the rate of the slower components. To provide insight into the effect of the anchoring groups, the electronic structures of Re-bipyridyl-Ti model clusters containing carboxylate and phosphonate anchoring groups and with and without a CH 2 spacer were computed using density functional theory. With the CH 2 spacer, die phosphonate group led to a stronger electronic coupling between bpy and Ti center than the carboxylate group, which accounted for the faster injection from ReC1P than ReC1A. When the anchoring groups were directly connected to the bpy ligand without the CH 2 spacer, such as in RuN3 and RuN3P, their effects were 2-fold: the carboxylate group enhanced the electronic coupling of bpy π* with TiO 2 and lowered the energy of the bpy orbital. How these competing factors led to different effects on TiO 2 and SnO 2 and on different components of the biphasic injection kinetics were discussed.

AB - The effects of anchoring groups on electron injection from adsorbate to nanocrystalline thin films were investigated by comparing injection kinetics through carboxylate versus phosphonate groups to TiO 2 and SnO 2. In the first pair of molecules, Re(L A)(CO) 3Cl (ReC1A) and Re(Lp)(CO)3Cl (ReC1P), [L A = 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-bis-CH 2-COOH, Lp= 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-bis-CH 2-PO 3H 2], the anchoring groups were insulated from the bipyridine ligand by a CH 2 group. In the second pair of molecules, Ru(dcbpyH 2) 2(NCS) 2 (RuN3) and Ru(bpbpyH 2) 2(NCS) 2 (RuN3P), [dcbpy = 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-biscarboxylic acid, bpbpy = 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-bisphosphonic acid], the anchoring groups were directly connected to the bipyridine ligands. The injection kinetics, as measured by subpicosecond IR absorption spectroscopy, showed that electron injection rates from ReC1P to both TiO 2 and SnO 2 were faster than those from ReC1A. The injection rates from RuN3 and RuN3P to SnO 2 films were similar. On TiO 2, the injection kinetics from RuN3 and RuN3P were biphasic: carboxylate group enhances the rate of the <100 fs component, but reduces the rate of the slower components. To provide insight into the effect of the anchoring groups, the electronic structures of Re-bipyridyl-Ti model clusters containing carboxylate and phosphonate anchoring groups and with and without a CH 2 spacer were computed using density functional theory. With the CH 2 spacer, die phosphonate group led to a stronger electronic coupling between bpy and Ti center than the carboxylate group, which accounted for the faster injection from ReC1P than ReC1A. When the anchoring groups were directly connected to the bpy ligand without the CH 2 spacer, such as in RuN3 and RuN3P, their effects were 2-fold: the carboxylate group enhanced the electronic coupling of bpy π* with TiO 2 and lowered the energy of the bpy orbital. How these competing factors led to different effects on TiO 2 and SnO 2 and on different components of the biphasic injection kinetics were discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547660168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547660168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/jp0709003

DO - 10.1021/jp0709003

M3 - Article

VL - 111

SP - 6832

EP - 6842

JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry A

JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry A

SN - 1089-5639

IS - 29

ER -