Controlling electron transfer in donor-bridge-acceptor molecules using cross-conjugated bridges

Annie Butler Ricks, Gemma C. Solomon, Michael T. Colvin, Amy M. Scott, Kun Chen, Mark A Ratner, Michael R Wasielewski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

113 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Photoinitiated charge separation (CS) and recombination (CR) in a series of donor-bridge-acceptor (D-B-A) molecules with cross-conjugated, linearly conjugated, and saturated bridges have been compared and contrasted using time-resolved spectroscopy. The photoexcited charge transfer state of 3,5-dimethyl-4-(9-anthracenyl)julolidine (DMJ-An) is the donor, and naphthalene-1,8:4,5-bis(dicarboximide) (NI) is the acceptor in all cases, along with 1,1-diphenylethene, trans-stilbene, diphenylmethane, and xanthone bridges. Photoinitiated CS through the cross-conjugated 1,1-diphenylethene bridge is about 30 times slower than through its linearly conjugated trans-stilbene counterpart and is comparable to that observed through the diphenylmethane bridge. This result implies that cross-conjugation strongly decreases the π orbital contribution to the donor-acceptor electronic coupling so that electron transfer most likely uses the bridge σ system as its primary CS pathway. In contrast, the CS rate through the cross-conjugated xanthone bridge is comparable to that observed through the linearly conjugated trans-stilbene bridge. Molecular conductance calculations on these bridges show that cross-conjugation results in quantum interference effects that greatly alter the through-bridge donor-acceptor electronic coupling as a function of charge injection energy. These calculations display trends that agree well with the observed trends in the electron transfer rates.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15427-15434
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Chemical Society
Volume132
Issue number43
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 3 2010

Fingerprint

Stilbenes
Electrons
Molecules
Genetic Recombination
Spectrum Analysis
Injections
Charge injection
Naphthalene
xanthone
1,1-diphenylethene
diphenylmethane
3,5-dimethyl-4-(9-anthracenyl)julolidine
Charge transfer
Spectroscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Catalysis
  • Biochemistry
  • Colloid and Surface Chemistry

Cite this

Controlling electron transfer in donor-bridge-acceptor molecules using cross-conjugated bridges. / Ricks, Annie Butler; Solomon, Gemma C.; Colvin, Michael T.; Scott, Amy M.; Chen, Kun; Ratner, Mark A; Wasielewski, Michael R.

In: Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 132, No. 43, 03.11.2010, p. 15427-15434.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ricks, Annie Butler ; Solomon, Gemma C. ; Colvin, Michael T. ; Scott, Amy M. ; Chen, Kun ; Ratner, Mark A ; Wasielewski, Michael R. / Controlling electron transfer in donor-bridge-acceptor molecules using cross-conjugated bridges. In: Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2010 ; Vol. 132, No. 43. pp. 15427-15434.
@article{d091f1c7a63a4dd79832f16025aeb7a2,
title = "Controlling electron transfer in donor-bridge-acceptor molecules using cross-conjugated bridges",
abstract = "Photoinitiated charge separation (CS) and recombination (CR) in a series of donor-bridge-acceptor (D-B-A) molecules with cross-conjugated, linearly conjugated, and saturated bridges have been compared and contrasted using time-resolved spectroscopy. The photoexcited charge transfer state of 3,5-dimethyl-4-(9-anthracenyl)julolidine (DMJ-An) is the donor, and naphthalene-1,8:4,5-bis(dicarboximide) (NI) is the acceptor in all cases, along with 1,1-diphenylethene, trans-stilbene, diphenylmethane, and xanthone bridges. Photoinitiated CS through the cross-conjugated 1,1-diphenylethene bridge is about 30 times slower than through its linearly conjugated trans-stilbene counterpart and is comparable to that observed through the diphenylmethane bridge. This result implies that cross-conjugation strongly decreases the π orbital contribution to the donor-acceptor electronic coupling so that electron transfer most likely uses the bridge σ system as its primary CS pathway. In contrast, the CS rate through the cross-conjugated xanthone bridge is comparable to that observed through the linearly conjugated trans-stilbene bridge. Molecular conductance calculations on these bridges show that cross-conjugation results in quantum interference effects that greatly alter the through-bridge donor-acceptor electronic coupling as a function of charge injection energy. These calculations display trends that agree well with the observed trends in the electron transfer rates.",
author = "Ricks, {Annie Butler} and Solomon, {Gemma C.} and Colvin, {Michael T.} and Scott, {Amy M.} and Kun Chen and Ratner, {Mark A} and Wasielewski, {Michael R}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1021/ja107420a",
language = "English",
volume = "132",
pages = "15427--15434",
journal = "Journal of the American Chemical Society",
issn = "0002-7863",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "43",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Controlling electron transfer in donor-bridge-acceptor molecules using cross-conjugated bridges

AU - Ricks, Annie Butler

AU - Solomon, Gemma C.

AU - Colvin, Michael T.

AU - Scott, Amy M.

AU - Chen, Kun

AU - Ratner, Mark A

AU - Wasielewski, Michael R

PY - 2010/11/3

Y1 - 2010/11/3

N2 - Photoinitiated charge separation (CS) and recombination (CR) in a series of donor-bridge-acceptor (D-B-A) molecules with cross-conjugated, linearly conjugated, and saturated bridges have been compared and contrasted using time-resolved spectroscopy. The photoexcited charge transfer state of 3,5-dimethyl-4-(9-anthracenyl)julolidine (DMJ-An) is the donor, and naphthalene-1,8:4,5-bis(dicarboximide) (NI) is the acceptor in all cases, along with 1,1-diphenylethene, trans-stilbene, diphenylmethane, and xanthone bridges. Photoinitiated CS through the cross-conjugated 1,1-diphenylethene bridge is about 30 times slower than through its linearly conjugated trans-stilbene counterpart and is comparable to that observed through the diphenylmethane bridge. This result implies that cross-conjugation strongly decreases the π orbital contribution to the donor-acceptor electronic coupling so that electron transfer most likely uses the bridge σ system as its primary CS pathway. In contrast, the CS rate through the cross-conjugated xanthone bridge is comparable to that observed through the linearly conjugated trans-stilbene bridge. Molecular conductance calculations on these bridges show that cross-conjugation results in quantum interference effects that greatly alter the through-bridge donor-acceptor electronic coupling as a function of charge injection energy. These calculations display trends that agree well with the observed trends in the electron transfer rates.

AB - Photoinitiated charge separation (CS) and recombination (CR) in a series of donor-bridge-acceptor (D-B-A) molecules with cross-conjugated, linearly conjugated, and saturated bridges have been compared and contrasted using time-resolved spectroscopy. The photoexcited charge transfer state of 3,5-dimethyl-4-(9-anthracenyl)julolidine (DMJ-An) is the donor, and naphthalene-1,8:4,5-bis(dicarboximide) (NI) is the acceptor in all cases, along with 1,1-diphenylethene, trans-stilbene, diphenylmethane, and xanthone bridges. Photoinitiated CS through the cross-conjugated 1,1-diphenylethene bridge is about 30 times slower than through its linearly conjugated trans-stilbene counterpart and is comparable to that observed through the diphenylmethane bridge. This result implies that cross-conjugation strongly decreases the π orbital contribution to the donor-acceptor electronic coupling so that electron transfer most likely uses the bridge σ system as its primary CS pathway. In contrast, the CS rate through the cross-conjugated xanthone bridge is comparable to that observed through the linearly conjugated trans-stilbene bridge. Molecular conductance calculations on these bridges show that cross-conjugation results in quantum interference effects that greatly alter the through-bridge donor-acceptor electronic coupling as a function of charge injection energy. These calculations display trends that agree well with the observed trends in the electron transfer rates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049371709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78049371709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/ja107420a

DO - 10.1021/ja107420a

M3 - Article

C2 - 20942407

AN - SCOPUS:78049371709

VL - 132

SP - 15427

EP - 15434

JO - Journal of the American Chemical Society

JF - Journal of the American Chemical Society

SN - 0002-7863

IS - 43

ER -