There was an error in the value of the transition energy (E0-0) for the PB6 dye on the electrode, which should be 1.96 eV instead of 2.14 eV. E(PB6∗/PB6-) is therefore changed to 1.03 V vs. NHE accordingly. The following figure should be substituted for the incorrect Fig. 1: (Figure Presented). The following changes should be made accordingly on page 37, 6th paragraph: "The obtained energy alignment indicated that the hole (DG0 = Δ530 mV) and electron injection (DG0 = Δ430 mV) into the NiO valence band (VB) and the TiO2 conduction band (CB), respectively, from the excited PB6 (E0-0 = 1.96 eV) were thermodynamically favorable, as indicated in Fig. 1b and Table S1 (ESI)." Table S1 in the supporting information has been updated accordingly. These changes do not influence the method used and the conclusions reported in this work. Acknowledgements The author is grateful to Dr Bo Xu from Uppsala University for pointing out the above error. The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Physics and Astronomy(all)
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry