Abstract
There was an error in the value of the transition energy (E0-0) for the PB6 dye on the electrode, which should be 1.96 eV instead of 2.14 eV. E(PB6∗/PB6-) is therefore changed to 1.03 V vs. NHE accordingly. The following figure should be substituted for the incorrect Fig. 1: (Figure Presented). The following changes should be made accordingly on page 37, 6th paragraph: "The obtained energy alignment indicated that the hole (DG0 = Δ530 mV) and electron injection (DG0 = Δ430 mV) into the NiO valence band (VB) and the TiO2 conduction band (CB), respectively, from the excited PB6 (E0-0 = 1.96 eV) were thermodynamically favorable, as indicated in Fig. 1b and Table S1 (ESI)." Table S1 in the supporting information has been updated accordingly. These changes do not influence the method used and the conclusions reported in this work. Acknowledgements The author is grateful to Dr Bo Xu from Uppsala University for pointing out the above error. The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 46 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Jan 1 2018 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Physics and Astronomy(all)
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Cite this
Correction : Ultrafast dye regeneration in a core-shell NiO-dye-TiO2 mesoporous film (Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (2018) 20 (36-40) DOI: 10.1039/C7CP07088H). / Tian, Lei; Föhlinger, Jens; Pati, Palas Baran; Zhang, Zhibin; Lin, Junzhong; Yang, Wenxing; Johansson, Malin; Kubart, Tomas; Sun, Junliang; Boschloo, Gerrit; Hammarström, Leif; Tian, Haining.
In: Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Vol. 20, No. 46, 01.01.2018.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction
T2 - Ultrafast dye regeneration in a core-shell NiO-dye-TiO2 mesoporous film (Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (2018) 20 (36-40) DOI: 10.1039/C7CP07088H)
AU - Tian, Lei
AU - Föhlinger, Jens
AU - Pati, Palas Baran
AU - Zhang, Zhibin
AU - Lin, Junzhong
AU - Yang, Wenxing
AU - Johansson, Malin
AU - Kubart, Tomas
AU - Sun, Junliang
AU - Boschloo, Gerrit
AU - Hammarström, Leif
AU - Tian, Haining
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - There was an error in the value of the transition energy (E0-0) for the PB6 dye on the electrode, which should be 1.96 eV instead of 2.14 eV. E(PB6∗/PB6-) is therefore changed to 1.03 V vs. NHE accordingly. The following figure should be substituted for the incorrect Fig. 1: (Figure Presented). The following changes should be made accordingly on page 37, 6th paragraph: "The obtained energy alignment indicated that the hole (DG0 = Δ530 mV) and electron injection (DG0 = Δ430 mV) into the NiO valence band (VB) and the TiO2 conduction band (CB), respectively, from the excited PB6 (E0-0 = 1.96 eV) were thermodynamically favorable, as indicated in Fig. 1b and Table S1 (ESI)." Table S1 in the supporting information has been updated accordingly. These changes do not influence the method used and the conclusions reported in this work. Acknowledgements The author is grateful to Dr Bo Xu from Uppsala University for pointing out the above error. The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
AB - There was an error in the value of the transition energy (E0-0) for the PB6 dye on the electrode, which should be 1.96 eV instead of 2.14 eV. E(PB6∗/PB6-) is therefore changed to 1.03 V vs. NHE accordingly. The following figure should be substituted for the incorrect Fig. 1: (Figure Presented). The following changes should be made accordingly on page 37, 6th paragraph: "The obtained energy alignment indicated that the hole (DG0 = Δ530 mV) and electron injection (DG0 = Δ430 mV) into the NiO valence band (VB) and the TiO2 conduction band (CB), respectively, from the excited PB6 (E0-0 = 1.96 eV) were thermodynamically favorable, as indicated in Fig. 1b and Table S1 (ESI)." Table S1 in the supporting information has been updated accordingly. These changes do not influence the method used and the conclusions reported in this work. Acknowledgements The author is grateful to Dr Bo Xu from Uppsala University for pointing out the above error. The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057284636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057284636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/c8cp91912g
DO - 10.1039/c8cp91912g
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 30431629
AN - SCOPUS:85057284636
VL - 20
JO - Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
JF - Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
SN - 1463-9076
IS - 46
ER -