Corrigendum to “Mechanistic aspects of CO₂ reduction catalysis with manganese-based molecular catalysts” [Coord. Chem. Rev. 374 (2018) 173–217] (Coordination Chemistry Reviews (2018) 374 (173–217), (S0010854518300493), (10.1016/j.ccr.2018.05.022))

The authors regret that in Scheme 10 on p. 207, and the associated text on p. 208, the redox potential for the BI radical, E(BI⁺/BI), was incorrectly reported as −2.06 V vs. SCE. The correct value is −1.68 V vs. SCE. Provided below is an updated version of Scheme 10 with the correct value of this redox potential, in addition to corrected free energy differences (ΔG). [Figure presented] Scheme 10. Energy level alignment diagram illustrating the relevant reduction potentials (in CH₃CN vs SCE) for the TEOA, BNAH, and BIH SEDs, including the BNA₂ and BI intermediate reductants (black bars), the ground state (green bars) and excited state (*, red bars) reduction potentials for the [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ photosensitizer [185] (PS), and the ground state reduction potentials for the [MnBr(bpy)(CO)₃] (2) and [Mn(bpy)(CO)₃(CH₃CN)]⁺ (6) pre-catalysts (blue bars). The ³E_0-0 triplet energy of the {³[Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺}* excited state was estimated from the phosphorescence emission spectrum recorded at 77 K in EtOH:MeOH (4:1) at 10% height of the highest energy band edge (599 nm). Free energy changes are included for the SED → PS* reductive quenching electron transfer reactions as well as the PS− → pre-catalyst electron transfer reactions. The associated passage of text at the bottom of p. 208 (first column) is also corrected accordingly below: “However, in the case of BIH, after deprotonation of BIH⁺, the strongly reducing BI radical (E(BI⁺/BI) = −1.68 V vs. SCE) does not dimerize and has been shown to donate a second electron into the system (even to the ground state of the PS) (Eq. (25)) [184].” The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.