Covalency in crystal field theory: KNiF3

R. E. Watson, Arthur J Freeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The theory of covalency in crystal field phenomena is examined, using, as example, the Ni-F6 complex in KNiF3. The Hund-Mulliken-Van Vleck molecular orbital-linear combination of atomic orbitals treatment is followed. The role of the antibonding and bonding electrons in the complex is discussed from a multielectron point of view. The exact self-consistent one-electron Hamiltonian is discussed in some detail. Emphasis is placed on elucidating the source and nature of the covalent effects appropriate to the various physical phenomena. We find that it is the covalent mixing of those bonding electrons having no antibonding partners which contribute to all experimental observables (including the crystal field splitting 10 Dq, transferred hyperfine interactions, neutron magnetic form factors, and superexchange interactions). This view of covalency differs markedly from the one followed by Sugano and Shulman, in that the covalency of the antibonding electrons, which are assigned the sole role in their approach, is totally irrelevant. Quantitative numerical estimates (using approximations to the exact Hamiltonian) are given for the two models of the covalent effects in KNiF3, i.e., "unpaired" bonding and antibonding; they are shown to differ strongly. The relative roles of overlap and covalency are discussed; covalency is found to play an important but by no means dominant role. Numerical agreement between the present inexact cluster theory and experiment is found to be poor. The various sources of this disagreement are reviewed.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPhysical Review
Volume134
Issue number6A
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1964

Fingerprint

crystal field theory
electrons
form factors
molecular orbitals
interactions
neutrons
orbitals
estimates
approximation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Covalency in crystal field theory : KNiF3. / Watson, R. E.; Freeman, Arthur J.

In: Physical Review, Vol. 134, No. 6A, 1964.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d93441b9422d4239b7bd6c4949e02155,
title = "Covalency in crystal field theory: KNiF3",
abstract = "The theory of covalency in crystal field phenomena is examined, using, as example, the Ni-F6 complex in KNiF3. The Hund-Mulliken-Van Vleck molecular orbital-linear combination of atomic orbitals treatment is followed. The role of the antibonding and bonding electrons in the complex is discussed from a multielectron point of view. The exact self-consistent one-electron Hamiltonian is discussed in some detail. Emphasis is placed on elucidating the source and nature of the covalent effects appropriate to the various physical phenomena. We find that it is the covalent mixing of those bonding electrons having no antibonding partners which contribute to all experimental observables (including the crystal field splitting 10 Dq, transferred hyperfine interactions, neutron magnetic form factors, and superexchange interactions). This view of covalency differs markedly from the one followed by Sugano and Shulman, in that the covalency of the antibonding electrons, which are assigned the sole role in their approach, is totally irrelevant. Quantitative numerical estimates (using approximations to the exact Hamiltonian) are given for the two models of the covalent effects in KNiF3, i.e., {"}unpaired{"} bonding and antibonding; they are shown to differ strongly. The relative roles of overlap and covalency are discussed; covalency is found to play an important but by no means dominant role. Numerical agreement between the present inexact cluster theory and experiment is found to be poor. The various sources of this disagreement are reviewed.",
author = "Watson, {R. E.} and Freeman, {Arthur J}",
year = "1964",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRev.134.A1526",
language = "English",
volume = "134",
journal = "Physical Review",
issn = "0031-899X",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "6A",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Covalency in crystal field theory

T2 - KNiF3

AU - Watson, R. E.

AU - Freeman, Arthur J

PY - 1964

Y1 - 1964

N2 - The theory of covalency in crystal field phenomena is examined, using, as example, the Ni-F6 complex in KNiF3. The Hund-Mulliken-Van Vleck molecular orbital-linear combination of atomic orbitals treatment is followed. The role of the antibonding and bonding electrons in the complex is discussed from a multielectron point of view. The exact self-consistent one-electron Hamiltonian is discussed in some detail. Emphasis is placed on elucidating the source and nature of the covalent effects appropriate to the various physical phenomena. We find that it is the covalent mixing of those bonding electrons having no antibonding partners which contribute to all experimental observables (including the crystal field splitting 10 Dq, transferred hyperfine interactions, neutron magnetic form factors, and superexchange interactions). This view of covalency differs markedly from the one followed by Sugano and Shulman, in that the covalency of the antibonding electrons, which are assigned the sole role in their approach, is totally irrelevant. Quantitative numerical estimates (using approximations to the exact Hamiltonian) are given for the two models of the covalent effects in KNiF3, i.e., "unpaired" bonding and antibonding; they are shown to differ strongly. The relative roles of overlap and covalency are discussed; covalency is found to play an important but by no means dominant role. Numerical agreement between the present inexact cluster theory and experiment is found to be poor. The various sources of this disagreement are reviewed.

AB - The theory of covalency in crystal field phenomena is examined, using, as example, the Ni-F6 complex in KNiF3. The Hund-Mulliken-Van Vleck molecular orbital-linear combination of atomic orbitals treatment is followed. The role of the antibonding and bonding electrons in the complex is discussed from a multielectron point of view. The exact self-consistent one-electron Hamiltonian is discussed in some detail. Emphasis is placed on elucidating the source and nature of the covalent effects appropriate to the various physical phenomena. We find that it is the covalent mixing of those bonding electrons having no antibonding partners which contribute to all experimental observables (including the crystal field splitting 10 Dq, transferred hyperfine interactions, neutron magnetic form factors, and superexchange interactions). This view of covalency differs markedly from the one followed by Sugano and Shulman, in that the covalency of the antibonding electrons, which are assigned the sole role in their approach, is totally irrelevant. Quantitative numerical estimates (using approximations to the exact Hamiltonian) are given for the two models of the covalent effects in KNiF3, i.e., "unpaired" bonding and antibonding; they are shown to differ strongly. The relative roles of overlap and covalency are discussed; covalency is found to play an important but by no means dominant role. Numerical agreement between the present inexact cluster theory and experiment is found to be poor. The various sources of this disagreement are reviewed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000755108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000755108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRev.134.A1526

DO - 10.1103/PhysRev.134.A1526

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000755108

VL - 134

JO - Physical Review

JF - Physical Review

SN - 0031-899X

IS - 6A

ER -