Do Combined Heat and Power plants perform? Case study of publicly funded projects in New York

Rasika Athawale, Frank Felder, Leo A. Goldman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigate lower than expected capacity factors of Combined Heat and Power plants using a publicly available dataset of hourly performance for plants in the state of New York. Low utilization of a CHP indicates underperformance. We examine possible causes of this underperformance including economic arbitrage, poor maintenance and operational practices, oversizing of plants, and reliability and resiliency needs. Based on seasonal and weekday/weekend capacity factor averages, we find that there is not enough evidence to support the economic arbitrage cause. Out of 99 plants in the dataset, 64 plants have average capacity factor below 60%, indicating they are either oversized and/or poorly maintained. This suggests that the current practice of one-time fixed incentive ($/kW) favors investment in capacity with no incentive for utilization (unlike a production credit which incentivizes generation $/kW h). From a policy perspective, this paper recommends better pre-engineering assessment for correct sizing, as well as revision of incentives based on performance. Additional information should be collected so that a more accurate ongoing analysis of the societal benefits of CHP projects can be made. Lastly, the energy efficiency gap may be smaller than is commonly assumed and other options should be explored to meet energy efficiency goals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)618-627
Number of pages10
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume97
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Cogeneration plants
combined heat and power
Energy efficiency
power plant
incentive
Economics
energy efficiency
economics
engineering
project

Keywords

  • Capacity factor
  • Combined Heat and Power
  • Energy efficiency gap

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Do Combined Heat and Power plants perform? Case study of publicly funded projects in New York. / Athawale, Rasika; Felder, Frank; Goldman, Leo A.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 97, 01.10.2016, p. 618-627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4d362110291f44dfac1a226a05e13ad4,
title = "Do Combined Heat and Power plants perform? Case study of publicly funded projects in New York",
abstract = "We investigate lower than expected capacity factors of Combined Heat and Power plants using a publicly available dataset of hourly performance for plants in the state of New York. Low utilization of a CHP indicates underperformance. We examine possible causes of this underperformance including economic arbitrage, poor maintenance and operational practices, oversizing of plants, and reliability and resiliency needs. Based on seasonal and weekday/weekend capacity factor averages, we find that there is not enough evidence to support the economic arbitrage cause. Out of 99 plants in the dataset, 64 plants have average capacity factor below 60{\%}, indicating they are either oversized and/or poorly maintained. This suggests that the current practice of one-time fixed incentive ($/kW) favors investment in capacity with no incentive for utilization (unlike a production credit which incentivizes generation $/kW h). From a policy perspective, this paper recommends better pre-engineering assessment for correct sizing, as well as revision of incentives based on performance. Additional information should be collected so that a more accurate ongoing analysis of the societal benefits of CHP projects can be made. Lastly, the energy efficiency gap may be smaller than is commonly assumed and other options should be explored to meet energy efficiency goals.",
keywords = "Capacity factor, Combined Heat and Power, Energy efficiency gap",
author = "Rasika Athawale and Frank Felder and Goldman, {Leo A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.030",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "618--627",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Combined Heat and Power plants perform? Case study of publicly funded projects in New York

AU - Athawale, Rasika

AU - Felder, Frank

AU - Goldman, Leo A.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - We investigate lower than expected capacity factors of Combined Heat and Power plants using a publicly available dataset of hourly performance for plants in the state of New York. Low utilization of a CHP indicates underperformance. We examine possible causes of this underperformance including economic arbitrage, poor maintenance and operational practices, oversizing of plants, and reliability and resiliency needs. Based on seasonal and weekday/weekend capacity factor averages, we find that there is not enough evidence to support the economic arbitrage cause. Out of 99 plants in the dataset, 64 plants have average capacity factor below 60%, indicating they are either oversized and/or poorly maintained. This suggests that the current practice of one-time fixed incentive ($/kW) favors investment in capacity with no incentive for utilization (unlike a production credit which incentivizes generation $/kW h). From a policy perspective, this paper recommends better pre-engineering assessment for correct sizing, as well as revision of incentives based on performance. Additional information should be collected so that a more accurate ongoing analysis of the societal benefits of CHP projects can be made. Lastly, the energy efficiency gap may be smaller than is commonly assumed and other options should be explored to meet energy efficiency goals.

AB - We investigate lower than expected capacity factors of Combined Heat and Power plants using a publicly available dataset of hourly performance for plants in the state of New York. Low utilization of a CHP indicates underperformance. We examine possible causes of this underperformance including economic arbitrage, poor maintenance and operational practices, oversizing of plants, and reliability and resiliency needs. Based on seasonal and weekday/weekend capacity factor averages, we find that there is not enough evidence to support the economic arbitrage cause. Out of 99 plants in the dataset, 64 plants have average capacity factor below 60%, indicating they are either oversized and/or poorly maintained. This suggests that the current practice of one-time fixed incentive ($/kW) favors investment in capacity with no incentive for utilization (unlike a production credit which incentivizes generation $/kW h). From a policy perspective, this paper recommends better pre-engineering assessment for correct sizing, as well as revision of incentives based on performance. Additional information should be collected so that a more accurate ongoing analysis of the societal benefits of CHP projects can be made. Lastly, the energy efficiency gap may be smaller than is commonly assumed and other options should be explored to meet energy efficiency goals.

KW - Capacity factor

KW - Combined Heat and Power

KW - Energy efficiency gap

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982157008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982157008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.030

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.030

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 618

EP - 627

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

ER -