Does Marcus-Hush theory really work? The solvent dependence of intervalence charge-transfer energetics in (NH3)5RuII-4,4′-bipyridine-Ru III(NH3)55+ in the limit of infinite dilution

Joseph T Hupp, Yuhua Dong, Robert L. Blackbourn, Hong Lu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Because of concern about ion-pairing artifacts, the solvent dependence of the intervalence charge-transfer absorption energy for a prototypical mixed-valence system, (NH3)5RuIII-4,4′-bipyridine-Ru II(NH3)55+, has been reexamined in the limit of infinite dilution. New data are reported for 14 solvents. While one of these (hexamethylphosphoramide) yields anomalous energetics, the absorption energies for the remaining 13 solvents agree qualitatively with the predictions of the Marcus-Hush theory (i.e., two-sphere dielectric continuum theory). On a quantitative basis, however, there is substantial disagreement with theory, at least when the charge-transfer distance is equated with the metal-to-metal separation distance (as conventionally done). Replacement of this distance with a much shorter distance inferred from by electronic Stark-effect spectroscopy (Oh et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8161) leads to a 3-fold decrease in the magnitude of calculated solvent reorganizational contributions to the overall intervalence energy (and therefore, very good agreement with experiment). Unfortunately, the use of such a short charge-transfer distance (d = 5.1 ± 0.7 Å) also leads to a violation of one of the boundary conditions for use of the two-sphere model. Reformulation of the problem in terms of a generalized dipole-inversion, dielectric cavity problem (Brunschwig et al. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 3657), however, leads to nearly perfect agreement between theory and experiment. Additional analysis shows that experiment now also agrees reasonably well with theory regarding the magnitude of solvent-independent energy contributions. Finally, it is noted that downward revision in the estimated charge-transfer distance (from 11.3 to 5.1 Å) leads to a substantial upward revision in the experimental (i.e., oscillator-strength based) estimate of the electronic coupling element, Hif, for intervalence transfer. Further analysis, based on published data for longer bridges, suggests that charge-transfer distance revisions can also account (at least partially) for the seemingly weak dependence of Hif on distance in decaammineruthenium systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3278-3282
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Physical Chemistry
Volume97
Issue number13
Publication statusPublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Dilution
dilution
Charge transfer
charge transfer
Hempa
Metals
energy absorption
Stark effect
Experiments
Boundary conditions
Spectroscopy
Ions
electronics
oscillator strengths
metals
artifacts
inversions
boundary conditions
dipoles
continuums

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

Cite this

@article{2293722f661540f9b87b21ae0d729982,
title = "Does Marcus-Hush theory really work? The solvent dependence of intervalence charge-transfer energetics in (NH3)5RuII-4,4′-bipyridine-Ru III(NH3)55+ in the limit of infinite dilution",
abstract = "Because of concern about ion-pairing artifacts, the solvent dependence of the intervalence charge-transfer absorption energy for a prototypical mixed-valence system, (NH3)5RuIII-4,4′-bipyridine-Ru II(NH3)55+, has been reexamined in the limit of infinite dilution. New data are reported for 14 solvents. While one of these (hexamethylphosphoramide) yields anomalous energetics, the absorption energies for the remaining 13 solvents agree qualitatively with the predictions of the Marcus-Hush theory (i.e., two-sphere dielectric continuum theory). On a quantitative basis, however, there is substantial disagreement with theory, at least when the charge-transfer distance is equated with the metal-to-metal separation distance (as conventionally done). Replacement of this distance with a much shorter distance inferred from by electronic Stark-effect spectroscopy (Oh et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8161) leads to a 3-fold decrease in the magnitude of calculated solvent reorganizational contributions to the overall intervalence energy (and therefore, very good agreement with experiment). Unfortunately, the use of such a short charge-transfer distance (d = 5.1 ± 0.7 {\AA}) also leads to a violation of one of the boundary conditions for use of the two-sphere model. Reformulation of the problem in terms of a generalized dipole-inversion, dielectric cavity problem (Brunschwig et al. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 3657), however, leads to nearly perfect agreement between theory and experiment. Additional analysis shows that experiment now also agrees reasonably well with theory regarding the magnitude of solvent-independent energy contributions. Finally, it is noted that downward revision in the estimated charge-transfer distance (from 11.3 to 5.1 {\AA}) leads to a substantial upward revision in the experimental (i.e., oscillator-strength based) estimate of the electronic coupling element, Hif, for intervalence transfer. Further analysis, based on published data for longer bridges, suggests that charge-transfer distance revisions can also account (at least partially) for the seemingly weak dependence of Hif on distance in decaammineruthenium systems.",
author = "Hupp, {Joseph T} and Yuhua Dong and Blackbourn, {Robert L.} and Hong Lu",
year = "1993",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "3278--3282",
journal = "Journal of Physical Chemistry",
issn = "0022-3654",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Marcus-Hush theory really work? The solvent dependence of intervalence charge-transfer energetics in (NH3)5RuII-4,4′-bipyridine-Ru III(NH3)55+ in the limit of infinite dilution

AU - Hupp, Joseph T

AU - Dong, Yuhua

AU - Blackbourn, Robert L.

AU - Lu, Hong

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Because of concern about ion-pairing artifacts, the solvent dependence of the intervalence charge-transfer absorption energy for a prototypical mixed-valence system, (NH3)5RuIII-4,4′-bipyridine-Ru II(NH3)55+, has been reexamined in the limit of infinite dilution. New data are reported for 14 solvents. While one of these (hexamethylphosphoramide) yields anomalous energetics, the absorption energies for the remaining 13 solvents agree qualitatively with the predictions of the Marcus-Hush theory (i.e., two-sphere dielectric continuum theory). On a quantitative basis, however, there is substantial disagreement with theory, at least when the charge-transfer distance is equated with the metal-to-metal separation distance (as conventionally done). Replacement of this distance with a much shorter distance inferred from by electronic Stark-effect spectroscopy (Oh et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8161) leads to a 3-fold decrease in the magnitude of calculated solvent reorganizational contributions to the overall intervalence energy (and therefore, very good agreement with experiment). Unfortunately, the use of such a short charge-transfer distance (d = 5.1 ± 0.7 Å) also leads to a violation of one of the boundary conditions for use of the two-sphere model. Reformulation of the problem in terms of a generalized dipole-inversion, dielectric cavity problem (Brunschwig et al. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 3657), however, leads to nearly perfect agreement between theory and experiment. Additional analysis shows that experiment now also agrees reasonably well with theory regarding the magnitude of solvent-independent energy contributions. Finally, it is noted that downward revision in the estimated charge-transfer distance (from 11.3 to 5.1 Å) leads to a substantial upward revision in the experimental (i.e., oscillator-strength based) estimate of the electronic coupling element, Hif, for intervalence transfer. Further analysis, based on published data for longer bridges, suggests that charge-transfer distance revisions can also account (at least partially) for the seemingly weak dependence of Hif on distance in decaammineruthenium systems.

AB - Because of concern about ion-pairing artifacts, the solvent dependence of the intervalence charge-transfer absorption energy for a prototypical mixed-valence system, (NH3)5RuIII-4,4′-bipyridine-Ru II(NH3)55+, has been reexamined in the limit of infinite dilution. New data are reported for 14 solvents. While one of these (hexamethylphosphoramide) yields anomalous energetics, the absorption energies for the remaining 13 solvents agree qualitatively with the predictions of the Marcus-Hush theory (i.e., two-sphere dielectric continuum theory). On a quantitative basis, however, there is substantial disagreement with theory, at least when the charge-transfer distance is equated with the metal-to-metal separation distance (as conventionally done). Replacement of this distance with a much shorter distance inferred from by electronic Stark-effect spectroscopy (Oh et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8161) leads to a 3-fold decrease in the magnitude of calculated solvent reorganizational contributions to the overall intervalence energy (and therefore, very good agreement with experiment). Unfortunately, the use of such a short charge-transfer distance (d = 5.1 ± 0.7 Å) also leads to a violation of one of the boundary conditions for use of the two-sphere model. Reformulation of the problem in terms of a generalized dipole-inversion, dielectric cavity problem (Brunschwig et al. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 3657), however, leads to nearly perfect agreement between theory and experiment. Additional analysis shows that experiment now also agrees reasonably well with theory regarding the magnitude of solvent-independent energy contributions. Finally, it is noted that downward revision in the estimated charge-transfer distance (from 11.3 to 5.1 Å) leads to a substantial upward revision in the experimental (i.e., oscillator-strength based) estimate of the electronic coupling element, Hif, for intervalence transfer. Further analysis, based on published data for longer bridges, suggests that charge-transfer distance revisions can also account (at least partially) for the seemingly weak dependence of Hif on distance in decaammineruthenium systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000854889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000854889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 3278

EP - 3282

JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry

JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry

SN - 0022-3654

IS - 13

ER -