Electronic structure and photoelectron spectroscopy of the monomeric uranium(III) alkyl [η5-(CH3)5C5] 2UCH[Si(CH3)3]2

Santo Di Bella, Giuseppe Lanza, Ignazio L. Fragalà, Tobin J Marks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ground state configuration and the electronic structure of the title compound have been investigated by relativistic effective core potential configuration interaction ab initio calculations and He I/He II UV photoelectron spectroscopy. It has been found that the 4A″ [(a′)1 (a″)1 (a′)1] state, associated with the 5f3 uranium configuration, represents the molecular ground state and is close in energy to the higher-lying 4A″ (5f2 6d1) state. The comparison of the present photoelectron data and theoretical results with those reported for analogous lanthanide complexes indicates close similarities in metal-ligand bonding between the 4f and 5f M(III) organometallics. The relative stability of the 5f3 versus 5f2 6d1 uranium ion configuration correlates with the inherent chemical stability of U(III) organometallics, compared to that of the Th(III) (6d1) analogues. The easier M(IV) → M(III) reduction for U(IV) relative to Th(IV), the numerous examples of reductive elimination processes in U(IV) organometallic chemistry, and the greater Th-R versus U-R experimental homolytic bond disruption energies in cyclopentadienylactinide(IV) alkyls can all be rationalized in terms of the differing electronic stabilities of the U(III) and Th(III) ground states.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-208
Number of pages4
JournalOrganometallics
Volume15
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 9 1996

Fingerprint

Uranium
Organometallics
Photoelectron spectroscopy
Ground state
uranium
Electronic structure
photoelectron spectroscopy
electronic structure
ground state
configurations
spectroscopy
Lanthanoid Series Elements
Chemical stability
Photoelectrons
Ultraviolet spectroscopy
configuration interaction
elimination
photoelectrons
Metals
Ions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Inorganic Chemistry
  • Organic Chemistry

Cite this

Electronic structure and photoelectron spectroscopy of the monomeric uranium(III) alkyl [η5-(CH3)5C5] 2UCH[Si(CH3)3]2 . / Di Bella, Santo; Lanza, Giuseppe; Fragalà, Ignazio L.; Marks, Tobin J.

In: Organometallics, Vol. 15, No. 1, 09.01.1996, p. 205-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Di Bella, Santo ; Lanza, Giuseppe ; Fragalà, Ignazio L. ; Marks, Tobin J. / Electronic structure and photoelectron spectroscopy of the monomeric uranium(III) alkyl [η5-(CH3)5C5] 2UCH[Si(CH3)3]2 In: Organometallics. 1996 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 205-208.
@article{31f593bbe44541328681b915928fbbd5,
title = "Electronic structure and photoelectron spectroscopy of the monomeric uranium(III) alkyl [η5-(CH3)5C5] 2UCH[Si(CH3)3]2",
abstract = "The ground state configuration and the electronic structure of the title compound have been investigated by relativistic effective core potential configuration interaction ab initio calculations and He I/He II UV photoelectron spectroscopy. It has been found that the 4A″ [(a′)1 (a″)1 (a′)1] state, associated with the 5f3 uranium configuration, represents the molecular ground state and is close in energy to the higher-lying 4A″ (5f2 6d1) state. The comparison of the present photoelectron data and theoretical results with those reported for analogous lanthanide complexes indicates close similarities in metal-ligand bonding between the 4f and 5f M(III) organometallics. The relative stability of the 5f3 versus 5f2 6d1 uranium ion configuration correlates with the inherent chemical stability of U(III) organometallics, compared to that of the Th(III) (6d1) analogues. The easier M(IV) → M(III) reduction for U(IV) relative to Th(IV), the numerous examples of reductive elimination processes in U(IV) organometallic chemistry, and the greater Th-R versus U-R experimental homolytic bond disruption energies in cyclopentadienylactinide(IV) alkyls can all be rationalized in terms of the differing electronic stabilities of the U(III) and Th(III) ground states.",
author = "{Di Bella}, Santo and Giuseppe Lanza and Fragal{\`a}, {Ignazio L.} and Marks, {Tobin J}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "9",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "205--208",
journal = "Organometallics",
issn = "0276-7333",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electronic structure and photoelectron spectroscopy of the monomeric uranium(III) alkyl [η5-(CH3)5C5] 2UCH[Si(CH3)3]2

AU - Di Bella, Santo

AU - Lanza, Giuseppe

AU - Fragalà, Ignazio L.

AU - Marks, Tobin J

PY - 1996/1/9

Y1 - 1996/1/9

N2 - The ground state configuration and the electronic structure of the title compound have been investigated by relativistic effective core potential configuration interaction ab initio calculations and He I/He II UV photoelectron spectroscopy. It has been found that the 4A″ [(a′)1 (a″)1 (a′)1] state, associated with the 5f3 uranium configuration, represents the molecular ground state and is close in energy to the higher-lying 4A″ (5f2 6d1) state. The comparison of the present photoelectron data and theoretical results with those reported for analogous lanthanide complexes indicates close similarities in metal-ligand bonding between the 4f and 5f M(III) organometallics. The relative stability of the 5f3 versus 5f2 6d1 uranium ion configuration correlates with the inherent chemical stability of U(III) organometallics, compared to that of the Th(III) (6d1) analogues. The easier M(IV) → M(III) reduction for U(IV) relative to Th(IV), the numerous examples of reductive elimination processes in U(IV) organometallic chemistry, and the greater Th-R versus U-R experimental homolytic bond disruption energies in cyclopentadienylactinide(IV) alkyls can all be rationalized in terms of the differing electronic stabilities of the U(III) and Th(III) ground states.

AB - The ground state configuration and the electronic structure of the title compound have been investigated by relativistic effective core potential configuration interaction ab initio calculations and He I/He II UV photoelectron spectroscopy. It has been found that the 4A″ [(a′)1 (a″)1 (a′)1] state, associated with the 5f3 uranium configuration, represents the molecular ground state and is close in energy to the higher-lying 4A″ (5f2 6d1) state. The comparison of the present photoelectron data and theoretical results with those reported for analogous lanthanide complexes indicates close similarities in metal-ligand bonding between the 4f and 5f M(III) organometallics. The relative stability of the 5f3 versus 5f2 6d1 uranium ion configuration correlates with the inherent chemical stability of U(III) organometallics, compared to that of the Th(III) (6d1) analogues. The easier M(IV) → M(III) reduction for U(IV) relative to Th(IV), the numerous examples of reductive elimination processes in U(IV) organometallic chemistry, and the greater Th-R versus U-R experimental homolytic bond disruption energies in cyclopentadienylactinide(IV) alkyls can all be rationalized in terms of the differing electronic stabilities of the U(III) and Th(III) ground states.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001858631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001858631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001858631

VL - 15

SP - 205

EP - 208

JO - Organometallics

JF - Organometallics

SN - 0276-7333

IS - 1

ER -