Incentives for Combined Heat and Power plants

How to increase societal benefits?

Rasika Athawale, Frank Felder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Investments in new combined heat-and-power (CHP) facilities have fallen short of harnessing what is believed to be CHP's full achievable economic potential and attenuate societal benefits of reducing emissions and increasing resiliency of the power system. Various reasons have been found to explain this "CHP gap," an example of the "energy-efficiency gap." This paper examines the effects of understated capital costs and low and volatile CHP capacity factors, which historically are demonstrated by a large number of existing US units, on the economics of CHP facilities and thereby provide a possible explanation for the CHP gap. Given the probability distribution of profitability for a CHP plant, an incentive structure that is modeled similar to insurance against risk of unfavorable outcomes, might compare favorably to the present one-time upfront capital incentive model for attracting new investments. We recommend further research on assurance-based incentives for CHP projects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-132
Number of pages12
JournalUtilities Policy
Volume31
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

combined heat and power
power plant
heat
incentive
Power plant
Incentives
profitability
economics
energy efficiency
insurance
energy
efficiency
present
costs
cost

Keywords

  • Capacity factor
  • Combined Heat and Power
  • Societal benefits

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Development
  • Law
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Incentives for Combined Heat and Power plants : How to increase societal benefits? / Athawale, Rasika; Felder, Frank.

In: Utilities Policy, Vol. 31, 01.12.2014, p. 121-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0490e9a511b9414cacc3e00a28c121d2,
title = "Incentives for Combined Heat and Power plants: How to increase societal benefits?",
abstract = "Investments in new combined heat-and-power (CHP) facilities have fallen short of harnessing what is believed to be CHP's full achievable economic potential and attenuate societal benefits of reducing emissions and increasing resiliency of the power system. Various reasons have been found to explain this {"}CHP gap,{"} an example of the {"}energy-efficiency gap.{"} This paper examines the effects of understated capital costs and low and volatile CHP capacity factors, which historically are demonstrated by a large number of existing US units, on the economics of CHP facilities and thereby provide a possible explanation for the CHP gap. Given the probability distribution of profitability for a CHP plant, an incentive structure that is modeled similar to insurance against risk of unfavorable outcomes, might compare favorably to the present one-time upfront capital incentive model for attracting new investments. We recommend further research on assurance-based incentives for CHP projects.",
keywords = "Capacity factor, Combined Heat and Power, Societal benefits",
author = "Rasika Athawale and Frank Felder",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jup.2014.10.005",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "121--132",
journal = "Utilities Policy",
issn = "0957-1787",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incentives for Combined Heat and Power plants

T2 - How to increase societal benefits?

AU - Athawale, Rasika

AU - Felder, Frank

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Investments in new combined heat-and-power (CHP) facilities have fallen short of harnessing what is believed to be CHP's full achievable economic potential and attenuate societal benefits of reducing emissions and increasing resiliency of the power system. Various reasons have been found to explain this "CHP gap," an example of the "energy-efficiency gap." This paper examines the effects of understated capital costs and low and volatile CHP capacity factors, which historically are demonstrated by a large number of existing US units, on the economics of CHP facilities and thereby provide a possible explanation for the CHP gap. Given the probability distribution of profitability for a CHP plant, an incentive structure that is modeled similar to insurance against risk of unfavorable outcomes, might compare favorably to the present one-time upfront capital incentive model for attracting new investments. We recommend further research on assurance-based incentives for CHP projects.

AB - Investments in new combined heat-and-power (CHP) facilities have fallen short of harnessing what is believed to be CHP's full achievable economic potential and attenuate societal benefits of reducing emissions and increasing resiliency of the power system. Various reasons have been found to explain this "CHP gap," an example of the "energy-efficiency gap." This paper examines the effects of understated capital costs and low and volatile CHP capacity factors, which historically are demonstrated by a large number of existing US units, on the economics of CHP facilities and thereby provide a possible explanation for the CHP gap. Given the probability distribution of profitability for a CHP plant, an incentive structure that is modeled similar to insurance against risk of unfavorable outcomes, might compare favorably to the present one-time upfront capital incentive model for attracting new investments. We recommend further research on assurance-based incentives for CHP projects.

KW - Capacity factor

KW - Combined Heat and Power

KW - Societal benefits

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908620233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908620233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jup.2014.10.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jup.2014.10.005

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 121

EP - 132

JO - Utilities Policy

JF - Utilities Policy

SN - 0957-1787

ER -