Integrating financial theory and methods in electricity resource planning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Decision makers throughout the world are introducing risk and market forces in the electric power industry to lower costs and improve services. Incentive based regulation (IBR), which replaces cost of service ratemaking with an approach that divorces costs from revenues, exposes the utility to the risk of profits or losses depending on their performance. Regulators also are allowing for competition within the industry, most notably in the wholesale market and possibly in the retail market. Two financial approaches that incorporate risk in resource planning are evaluated: risk adjusted discount rates (RADR) and options theory (OT). These two complementary approaches are an improvement over the standard present value revenue requirement (PVRR). However, each method has some important limitations. By correctly using RADR and OT and understanding their limitations, decision makers can improve their ability to value risk properly in power plant projects and integrated resource plans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)149-154
Number of pages6
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume24
Issue number2 SPEC. ISS.
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1996

Fingerprint

electricity
Electricity
Planning
resource
discount rate
market
cost
divorce
Costs
industry
planning
method
Industry
incentive
power plant
Profitability
Power plants
decision
services

Keywords

  • Electricity resource planning
  • Options theory
  • Risk adjusted discount rates

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Integrating financial theory and methods in electricity resource planning. / Felder, Frank.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 24, No. 2 SPEC. ISS., 02.1996, p. 149-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{131f684998f64e309c7723bac64e8a2a,
title = "Integrating financial theory and methods in electricity resource planning",
abstract = "Decision makers throughout the world are introducing risk and market forces in the electric power industry to lower costs and improve services. Incentive based regulation (IBR), which replaces cost of service ratemaking with an approach that divorces costs from revenues, exposes the utility to the risk of profits or losses depending on their performance. Regulators also are allowing for competition within the industry, most notably in the wholesale market and possibly in the retail market. Two financial approaches that incorporate risk in resource planning are evaluated: risk adjusted discount rates (RADR) and options theory (OT). These two complementary approaches are an improvement over the standard present value revenue requirement (PVRR). However, each method has some important limitations. By correctly using RADR and OT and understanding their limitations, decision makers can improve their ability to value risk properly in power plant projects and integrated resource plans.",
keywords = "Electricity resource planning, Options theory, Risk adjusted discount rates",
author = "Frank Felder",
year = "1996",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/0301-4215(96)00096-1",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "149--154",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2 SPEC. ISS.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating financial theory and methods in electricity resource planning

AU - Felder, Frank

PY - 1996/2

Y1 - 1996/2

N2 - Decision makers throughout the world are introducing risk and market forces in the electric power industry to lower costs and improve services. Incentive based regulation (IBR), which replaces cost of service ratemaking with an approach that divorces costs from revenues, exposes the utility to the risk of profits or losses depending on their performance. Regulators also are allowing for competition within the industry, most notably in the wholesale market and possibly in the retail market. Two financial approaches that incorporate risk in resource planning are evaluated: risk adjusted discount rates (RADR) and options theory (OT). These two complementary approaches are an improvement over the standard present value revenue requirement (PVRR). However, each method has some important limitations. By correctly using RADR and OT and understanding their limitations, decision makers can improve their ability to value risk properly in power plant projects and integrated resource plans.

AB - Decision makers throughout the world are introducing risk and market forces in the electric power industry to lower costs and improve services. Incentive based regulation (IBR), which replaces cost of service ratemaking with an approach that divorces costs from revenues, exposes the utility to the risk of profits or losses depending on their performance. Regulators also are allowing for competition within the industry, most notably in the wholesale market and possibly in the retail market. Two financial approaches that incorporate risk in resource planning are evaluated: risk adjusted discount rates (RADR) and options theory (OT). These two complementary approaches are an improvement over the standard present value revenue requirement (PVRR). However, each method has some important limitations. By correctly using RADR and OT and understanding their limitations, decision makers can improve their ability to value risk properly in power plant projects and integrated resource plans.

KW - Electricity resource planning

KW - Options theory

KW - Risk adjusted discount rates

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030084636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030084636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0301-4215(96)00096-1

DO - 10.1016/0301-4215(96)00096-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030084636

VL - 24

SP - 149

EP - 154

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

IS - 2 SPEC. ISS.

ER -