Methane storage in metal-organic frameworks

Current records, surprise findings, and challenges

Yang Peng, Vaiva Krungleviciute, Ibrahim Eryazici, Joseph T Hupp, Omar K. Farha, Taner Yildirim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

440 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We have examined the methane uptake properties of six of the most promising metal organic framework (MOF) materials: PCN-14, UTSA-20, HKUST-1, Ni-MOF-74 (Ni-CPO-27), NU-111, and NU-125. We discovered that HKUST-1, a material that is commercially available in gram scale, exhibits a room-temperature volumetric methane uptake that exceeds any value reported to date. The total uptake is about 230 cc(STP)/cc at 35 bar and 270 cc(STP)/cc at 65 bar, which meets the new volumetric target recently set by the Department of Energy (DOE) if the packing efficiency loss is ignored. We emphasize that MOFs with high surface areas and pore volumes perform better overall. NU-111, for example, reaches ∼75% of both the gravimetric and the volumetric targets. We find that values for gravimetric uptake, pore volume, and inverse density of the MOFs we studied scale essentially linearly with surface area. From this linear dependence, we estimate that a MOF with surface area 7500 m2/g and pore volume 3.2 cc/g could reach the current DOE gravimetric target of 0.5 g/g while simultaneously exhibiting around ∼200 cc/cc volumetric uptake. We note that while values for volumetric uptake are based on ideal single crystal densities, in reality the packing densities of MOFs are much lower. Finally, we show that compacting HKUST-1 into wafer shapes partially collapses the framework, decreasing both volumetric and gravimetric uptake significantly. Hence, one of the important challenges going forward is to find ways to pack MOFs efficiently without serious damage or to synthesize MOFs that can withstand substantial mechanical pressure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11887-11894
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Chemical Society
Volume135
Issue number32
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 14 2013

Fingerprint

Methane
Metals
Pregnenolone Carbonitrile
Single crystals
Pressure
Temperature
bis(1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate)tricopper(II)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Catalysis
  • Biochemistry
  • Colloid and Surface Chemistry

Cite this

Methane storage in metal-organic frameworks : Current records, surprise findings, and challenges. / Peng, Yang; Krungleviciute, Vaiva; Eryazici, Ibrahim; Hupp, Joseph T; Farha, Omar K.; Yildirim, Taner.

In: Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 135, No. 32, 14.08.2013, p. 11887-11894.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Peng, Yang ; Krungleviciute, Vaiva ; Eryazici, Ibrahim ; Hupp, Joseph T ; Farha, Omar K. ; Yildirim, Taner. / Methane storage in metal-organic frameworks : Current records, surprise findings, and challenges. In: Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2013 ; Vol. 135, No. 32. pp. 11887-11894.
@article{801ea360f8ca44529264aa42acb3d08e,
title = "Methane storage in metal-organic frameworks: Current records, surprise findings, and challenges",
abstract = "We have examined the methane uptake properties of six of the most promising metal organic framework (MOF) materials: PCN-14, UTSA-20, HKUST-1, Ni-MOF-74 (Ni-CPO-27), NU-111, and NU-125. We discovered that HKUST-1, a material that is commercially available in gram scale, exhibits a room-temperature volumetric methane uptake that exceeds any value reported to date. The total uptake is about 230 cc(STP)/cc at 35 bar and 270 cc(STP)/cc at 65 bar, which meets the new volumetric target recently set by the Department of Energy (DOE) if the packing efficiency loss is ignored. We emphasize that MOFs with high surface areas and pore volumes perform better overall. NU-111, for example, reaches ∼75{\%} of both the gravimetric and the volumetric targets. We find that values for gravimetric uptake, pore volume, and inverse density of the MOFs we studied scale essentially linearly with surface area. From this linear dependence, we estimate that a MOF with surface area 7500 m2/g and pore volume 3.2 cc/g could reach the current DOE gravimetric target of 0.5 g/g while simultaneously exhibiting around ∼200 cc/cc volumetric uptake. We note that while values for volumetric uptake are based on ideal single crystal densities, in reality the packing densities of MOFs are much lower. Finally, we show that compacting HKUST-1 into wafer shapes partially collapses the framework, decreasing both volumetric and gravimetric uptake significantly. Hence, one of the important challenges going forward is to find ways to pack MOFs efficiently without serious damage or to synthesize MOFs that can withstand substantial mechanical pressure.",
author = "Yang Peng and Vaiva Krungleviciute and Ibrahim Eryazici and Hupp, {Joseph T} and Farha, {Omar K.} and Taner Yildirim",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1021/ja4045289",
language = "English",
volume = "135",
pages = "11887--11894",
journal = "Journal of the American Chemical Society",
issn = "0002-7863",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "32",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methane storage in metal-organic frameworks

T2 - Current records, surprise findings, and challenges

AU - Peng, Yang

AU - Krungleviciute, Vaiva

AU - Eryazici, Ibrahim

AU - Hupp, Joseph T

AU - Farha, Omar K.

AU - Yildirim, Taner

PY - 2013/8/14

Y1 - 2013/8/14

N2 - We have examined the methane uptake properties of six of the most promising metal organic framework (MOF) materials: PCN-14, UTSA-20, HKUST-1, Ni-MOF-74 (Ni-CPO-27), NU-111, and NU-125. We discovered that HKUST-1, a material that is commercially available in gram scale, exhibits a room-temperature volumetric methane uptake that exceeds any value reported to date. The total uptake is about 230 cc(STP)/cc at 35 bar and 270 cc(STP)/cc at 65 bar, which meets the new volumetric target recently set by the Department of Energy (DOE) if the packing efficiency loss is ignored. We emphasize that MOFs with high surface areas and pore volumes perform better overall. NU-111, for example, reaches ∼75% of both the gravimetric and the volumetric targets. We find that values for gravimetric uptake, pore volume, and inverse density of the MOFs we studied scale essentially linearly with surface area. From this linear dependence, we estimate that a MOF with surface area 7500 m2/g and pore volume 3.2 cc/g could reach the current DOE gravimetric target of 0.5 g/g while simultaneously exhibiting around ∼200 cc/cc volumetric uptake. We note that while values for volumetric uptake are based on ideal single crystal densities, in reality the packing densities of MOFs are much lower. Finally, we show that compacting HKUST-1 into wafer shapes partially collapses the framework, decreasing both volumetric and gravimetric uptake significantly. Hence, one of the important challenges going forward is to find ways to pack MOFs efficiently without serious damage or to synthesize MOFs that can withstand substantial mechanical pressure.

AB - We have examined the methane uptake properties of six of the most promising metal organic framework (MOF) materials: PCN-14, UTSA-20, HKUST-1, Ni-MOF-74 (Ni-CPO-27), NU-111, and NU-125. We discovered that HKUST-1, a material that is commercially available in gram scale, exhibits a room-temperature volumetric methane uptake that exceeds any value reported to date. The total uptake is about 230 cc(STP)/cc at 35 bar and 270 cc(STP)/cc at 65 bar, which meets the new volumetric target recently set by the Department of Energy (DOE) if the packing efficiency loss is ignored. We emphasize that MOFs with high surface areas and pore volumes perform better overall. NU-111, for example, reaches ∼75% of both the gravimetric and the volumetric targets. We find that values for gravimetric uptake, pore volume, and inverse density of the MOFs we studied scale essentially linearly with surface area. From this linear dependence, we estimate that a MOF with surface area 7500 m2/g and pore volume 3.2 cc/g could reach the current DOE gravimetric target of 0.5 g/g while simultaneously exhibiting around ∼200 cc/cc volumetric uptake. We note that while values for volumetric uptake are based on ideal single crystal densities, in reality the packing densities of MOFs are much lower. Finally, we show that compacting HKUST-1 into wafer shapes partially collapses the framework, decreasing both volumetric and gravimetric uptake significantly. Hence, one of the important challenges going forward is to find ways to pack MOFs efficiently without serious damage or to synthesize MOFs that can withstand substantial mechanical pressure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882270355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882270355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/ja4045289

DO - 10.1021/ja4045289

M3 - Article

VL - 135

SP - 11887

EP - 11894

JO - Journal of the American Chemical Society

JF - Journal of the American Chemical Society

SN - 0002-7863

IS - 32

ER -