Reactive and nonreactive quenching of OH(A2+) in collisions with H atoms

George C Schatz, Brent Fisher, Will Grande, Ken Kumayama, Lisa A. Pederson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We use trajectory surface hopping methods to calculate cross sections and rate coefficients for reactive and nonreactive quenching of OH(A 2+) in collisions with H atoms. All calculations are based on multireference configuration interaction potential surfaces for the 11A′ and 21A′ surfaces of water, using a diabatic representation to describe electronic transitions. The overall rate of quenching plus reaction is in good agreement (lower by 25-30%) with earlier estimates at 300 and 1500 K. Analysis of the trajectories shows that this rate is dominated by a capture mechanism on the 21A′ state of water, with a nearly unity probability for hopping to the 11A′ state following formation of a short-lived collision complex. Both reactive and nonreactive decay of the complex are significant, with branching to H + OH (nonreactive quenching), H + OH (atom exchange with quenching), and O(1D) + H2 (reaction) accounting for approximately 45%, 35%, and 20%, respectively, of the product yield. The cross section for atom exchange without quenching is only 1-3% of the total quenching/reaction cross section. In contrast to what is often assumed in energy transfer studies, we find that the quenching and reactive cross sections are very weakly dependent on OH rotational quantum number for quantum numbers in the range 0-15. A statistical model provides only a rough description of product branching and product energy partitioning, indicating that the intermediate complexes are too short-lived to show statistical dynamics. We find that pure rotational energy transfer cross sections are small (few percent) compared with quenching/reaction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2515-2521
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Physical Chemistry A
Volume105
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - Mar 29 2001

Fingerprint

Quenching
quenching
Atoms
collisions
atoms
cross sections
Energy transfer
quantum numbers
Ion exchange
products
energy transfer
Trajectories
trajectories
Water
water
configuration interaction
unity
decay
coefficients
estimates

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

Cite this

Schatz, G. C., Fisher, B., Grande, W., Kumayama, K., & Pederson, L. A. (2001). Reactive and nonreactive quenching of OH(A2+) in collisions with H atoms. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 105(12), 2515-2521.

Reactive and nonreactive quenching of OH(A2+) in collisions with H atoms. / Schatz, George C; Fisher, Brent; Grande, Will; Kumayama, Ken; Pederson, Lisa A.

In: Journal of Physical Chemistry A, Vol. 105, No. 12, 29.03.2001, p. 2515-2521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schatz, GC, Fisher, B, Grande, W, Kumayama, K & Pederson, LA 2001, 'Reactive and nonreactive quenching of OH(A2+) in collisions with H atoms', Journal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 2515-2521.
Schatz GC, Fisher B, Grande W, Kumayama K, Pederson LA. Reactive and nonreactive quenching of OH(A2+) in collisions with H atoms. Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2001 Mar 29;105(12):2515-2521.
Schatz, George C ; Fisher, Brent ; Grande, Will ; Kumayama, Ken ; Pederson, Lisa A. / Reactive and nonreactive quenching of OH(A2+) in collisions with H atoms. In: Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2001 ; Vol. 105, No. 12. pp. 2515-2521.
@article{1d0627ee98ad4affab6908e603ce8464,
title = "Reactive and nonreactive quenching of OH(A2∑+) in collisions with H atoms",
abstract = "We use trajectory surface hopping methods to calculate cross sections and rate coefficients for reactive and nonreactive quenching of OH(A 2∑+) in collisions with H atoms. All calculations are based on multireference configuration interaction potential surfaces for the 11A′ and 21A′ surfaces of water, using a diabatic representation to describe electronic transitions. The overall rate of quenching plus reaction is in good agreement (lower by 25-30{\%}) with earlier estimates at 300 and 1500 K. Analysis of the trajectories shows that this rate is dominated by a capture mechanism on the 21A′ state of water, with a nearly unity probability for hopping to the 11A′ state following formation of a short-lived collision complex. Both reactive and nonreactive decay of the complex are significant, with branching to H + OH (nonreactive quenching), H + OH (atom exchange with quenching), and O(1D) + H2 (reaction) accounting for approximately 45{\%}, 35{\%}, and 20{\%}, respectively, of the product yield. The cross section for atom exchange without quenching is only 1-3{\%} of the total quenching/reaction cross section. In contrast to what is often assumed in energy transfer studies, we find that the quenching and reactive cross sections are very weakly dependent on OH rotational quantum number for quantum numbers in the range 0-15. A statistical model provides only a rough description of product branching and product energy partitioning, indicating that the intermediate complexes are too short-lived to show statistical dynamics. We find that pure rotational energy transfer cross sections are small (few percent) compared with quenching/reaction.",
author = "Schatz, {George C} and Brent Fisher and Will Grande and Ken Kumayama and Pederson, {Lisa A.}",
year = "2001",
month = "3",
day = "29",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "2515--2521",
journal = "Journal of Physical Chemistry A",
issn = "1089-5639",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reactive and nonreactive quenching of OH(A2∑+) in collisions with H atoms

AU - Schatz, George C

AU - Fisher, Brent

AU - Grande, Will

AU - Kumayama, Ken

AU - Pederson, Lisa A.

PY - 2001/3/29

Y1 - 2001/3/29

N2 - We use trajectory surface hopping methods to calculate cross sections and rate coefficients for reactive and nonreactive quenching of OH(A 2∑+) in collisions with H atoms. All calculations are based on multireference configuration interaction potential surfaces for the 11A′ and 21A′ surfaces of water, using a diabatic representation to describe electronic transitions. The overall rate of quenching plus reaction is in good agreement (lower by 25-30%) with earlier estimates at 300 and 1500 K. Analysis of the trajectories shows that this rate is dominated by a capture mechanism on the 21A′ state of water, with a nearly unity probability for hopping to the 11A′ state following formation of a short-lived collision complex. Both reactive and nonreactive decay of the complex are significant, with branching to H + OH (nonreactive quenching), H + OH (atom exchange with quenching), and O(1D) + H2 (reaction) accounting for approximately 45%, 35%, and 20%, respectively, of the product yield. The cross section for atom exchange without quenching is only 1-3% of the total quenching/reaction cross section. In contrast to what is often assumed in energy transfer studies, we find that the quenching and reactive cross sections are very weakly dependent on OH rotational quantum number for quantum numbers in the range 0-15. A statistical model provides only a rough description of product branching and product energy partitioning, indicating that the intermediate complexes are too short-lived to show statistical dynamics. We find that pure rotational energy transfer cross sections are small (few percent) compared with quenching/reaction.

AB - We use trajectory surface hopping methods to calculate cross sections and rate coefficients for reactive and nonreactive quenching of OH(A 2∑+) in collisions with H atoms. All calculations are based on multireference configuration interaction potential surfaces for the 11A′ and 21A′ surfaces of water, using a diabatic representation to describe electronic transitions. The overall rate of quenching plus reaction is in good agreement (lower by 25-30%) with earlier estimates at 300 and 1500 K. Analysis of the trajectories shows that this rate is dominated by a capture mechanism on the 21A′ state of water, with a nearly unity probability for hopping to the 11A′ state following formation of a short-lived collision complex. Both reactive and nonreactive decay of the complex are significant, with branching to H + OH (nonreactive quenching), H + OH (atom exchange with quenching), and O(1D) + H2 (reaction) accounting for approximately 45%, 35%, and 20%, respectively, of the product yield. The cross section for atom exchange without quenching is only 1-3% of the total quenching/reaction cross section. In contrast to what is often assumed in energy transfer studies, we find that the quenching and reactive cross sections are very weakly dependent on OH rotational quantum number for quantum numbers in the range 0-15. A statistical model provides only a rough description of product branching and product energy partitioning, indicating that the intermediate complexes are too short-lived to show statistical dynamics. We find that pure rotational energy transfer cross sections are small (few percent) compared with quenching/reaction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035967410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035967410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 105

SP - 2515

EP - 2521

JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry A

JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry A

SN - 1089-5639

IS - 12

ER -