Abstract
The previous Comment neglects an existence condition for convergence of the integral in question which was previously demonstrated Weber, Schafheitlin, Dixon, and Ferrar, and detailed by Watson. The reason for this is traced to the fact that the result quoted in the Comment relies on a misprint of this condition in the integral table quoted. The true integral is nonconvergent and the previous conclusions of Brown and Ciftan are incorrect.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3244 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Physical Review B |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1990 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Condensed Matter Physics
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to Elementary integral of Bessel functions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Badralexe, E., & Freeman, A. J. (1990). Reply to Elementary integral of Bessel functions. Physical Review B, 41(5), 3244. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.3244