Reply to Elementary integral of Bessel functions

E. Badralexe, Arthur J Freeman

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The previous Comment neglects an existence condition for convergence of the integral in question which was previously demonstrated Weber, Schafheitlin, Dixon, and Ferrar, and detailed by Watson. The reason for this is traced to the fact that the result quoted in the Comment relies on a misprint of this condition in the integral table quoted. The true integral is nonconvergent and the previous conclusions of Brown and Ciftan are incorrect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3244
Number of pages1
JournalPhysical Review B
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1990

Fingerprint

Bessel functions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Condensed Matter Physics

Cite this

Reply to Elementary integral of Bessel functions. / Badralexe, E.; Freeman, Arthur J.

In: Physical Review B, Vol. 41, No. 5, 1990, p. 3244.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Badralexe, E & Freeman, AJ 1990, 'Reply to Elementary integral of Bessel functions', Physical Review B, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 3244. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.3244
Badralexe E, Freeman AJ. Reply to Elementary integral of Bessel functions. Physical Review B. 1990;41(5):3244. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.3244
Badralexe, E. ; Freeman, Arthur J. / Reply to Elementary integral of Bessel functions. In: Physical Review B. 1990 ; Vol. 41, No. 5. pp. 3244.
@article{3b001b4a0c7f4ef4bb77d1b09b8592e6,
title = "Reply to Elementary integral of Bessel functions",
abstract = "The previous Comment neglects an existence condition for convergence of the integral in question which was previously demonstrated Weber, Schafheitlin, Dixon, and Ferrar, and detailed by Watson. The reason for this is traced to the fact that the result quoted in the Comment relies on a misprint of this condition in the integral table quoted. The true integral is nonconvergent and the previous conclusions of Brown and Ciftan are incorrect.",
author = "E. Badralexe and Freeman, {Arthur J}",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevB.41.3244",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "3244",
journal = "Physical Review B-Condensed Matter",
issn = "1098-0121",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Elementary integral of Bessel functions

AU - Badralexe, E.

AU - Freeman, Arthur J

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - The previous Comment neglects an existence condition for convergence of the integral in question which was previously demonstrated Weber, Schafheitlin, Dixon, and Ferrar, and detailed by Watson. The reason for this is traced to the fact that the result quoted in the Comment relies on a misprint of this condition in the integral table quoted. The true integral is nonconvergent and the previous conclusions of Brown and Ciftan are incorrect.

AB - The previous Comment neglects an existence condition for convergence of the integral in question which was previously demonstrated Weber, Schafheitlin, Dixon, and Ferrar, and detailed by Watson. The reason for this is traced to the fact that the result quoted in the Comment relies on a misprint of this condition in the integral table quoted. The true integral is nonconvergent and the previous conclusions of Brown and Ciftan are incorrect.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35949012691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35949012691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.3244

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.3244

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 3244

JO - Physical Review B-Condensed Matter

JF - Physical Review B-Condensed Matter

SN - 1098-0121

IS - 5

ER -

Access to Document