Should electricity markets have a capacity requirement? If so, how should it be priced?

Adam B. Jaffe, Frank Felder

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The possibility of non-market-clearing situations in power systems implies that there is a positive social externality associated with construction of capacity or reduction in peak load. In deciding whether and how to internalize this externality, the policy debate should focus on determining the optimal level of reliability and the best way to achieve it.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52-60
Number of pages9
JournalElectricity Journal
Volume9
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1996

Fingerprint

electricity
market
Externalities
Electricity market
Power markets
Power system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Law

Cite this

Should electricity markets have a capacity requirement? If so, how should it be priced? / Jaffe, Adam B.; Felder, Frank.

In: Electricity Journal, Vol. 9, No. 10, 12.1996, p. 52-60.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Jaffe, AB & Felder, F 1996, 'Should electricity markets have a capacity requirement? If so, how should it be priced?', Electricity Journal, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6190(96)80157-6
Jaffe AB, Felder F. Should electricity markets have a capacity requirement? If so, how should it be priced? Electricity Journal. 1996 Dec;9(10):52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6190(96)80157-6
Jaffe, Adam B. ; Felder, Frank. / Should electricity markets have a capacity requirement? If so, how should it be priced?. In: Electricity Journal. 1996 ; Vol. 9, No. 10. pp. 52-60.
@article{4a7a4f55a1b747fa8e862f3d0e55b828,
title = "Should electricity markets have a capacity requirement? If so, how should it be priced?",
abstract = "The possibility of non-market-clearing situations in power systems implies that there is a positive social externality associated with construction of capacity or reduction in peak load. In deciding whether and how to internalize this externality, the policy debate should focus on determining the optimal level of reliability and the best way to achieve it.",
author = "Jaffe, {Adam B.} and Frank Felder",
year = "1996",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/S1040-6190(96)80157-6",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "52--60",
journal = "Electricity Journal",
issn = "1040-6190",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should electricity markets have a capacity requirement? If so, how should it be priced?

AU - Jaffe, Adam B.

AU - Felder, Frank

PY - 1996/12

Y1 - 1996/12

N2 - The possibility of non-market-clearing situations in power systems implies that there is a positive social externality associated with construction of capacity or reduction in peak load. In deciding whether and how to internalize this externality, the policy debate should focus on determining the optimal level of reliability and the best way to achieve it.

AB - The possibility of non-market-clearing situations in power systems implies that there is a positive social externality associated with construction of capacity or reduction in peak load. In deciding whether and how to internalize this externality, the policy debate should focus on determining the optimal level of reliability and the best way to achieve it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0003071582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0003071582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1040-6190(96)80157-6

DO - 10.1016/S1040-6190(96)80157-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0003071582

VL - 9

SP - 52

EP - 60

JO - Electricity Journal

JF - Electricity Journal

SN - 1040-6190

IS - 10

ER -

Access to Document