Significance of heterogeneous surface growth in up-gradient and stationary-gradient crystallization

Dunbar P Birnie, M. C. Weinberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Gradient crystallization methods have been proposed and studied for creating microstructures which exhibit crystal orientation. For many of these processes it is possible for spurious heterogeneous nucleation and growth to occur from the sample sides and compete with desired oriented growth. We analyze this growth interference effect for two methods of crystallizing in a temperature gradient: either moving up a temperature gradient, or crystallizing in a stationary temperature gradient. It is demonstrated that the up-gradient technique is mainly suited to relatively long, narrow samples (with some restrictions), while the stationary gradient process is preferred when crystallizing normal to the large face of slab shaped samples. Limitations which constrain both of these gradient crystallization techniques are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Non-Crystalline Solids
Volume221
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1997

Fingerprint

Crystallization
Thermal gradients
crystallization
temperature gradients
gradients
Crystal orientation
Nucleation
constrictions
Microstructure
slabs
nucleation
interference
microstructure
crystals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ceramics and Composites
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

Cite this

Significance of heterogeneous surface growth in up-gradient and stationary-gradient crystallization. / Birnie, Dunbar P; Weinberg, M. C.

In: Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, Vol. 221, No. 1, 11.1997, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9927f21f4d6b4498b66b6a1d4c4c03c3,
title = "Significance of heterogeneous surface growth in up-gradient and stationary-gradient crystallization",
abstract = "Gradient crystallization methods have been proposed and studied for creating microstructures which exhibit crystal orientation. For many of these processes it is possible for spurious heterogeneous nucleation and growth to occur from the sample sides and compete with desired oriented growth. We analyze this growth interference effect for two methods of crystallizing in a temperature gradient: either moving up a temperature gradient, or crystallizing in a stationary temperature gradient. It is demonstrated that the up-gradient technique is mainly suited to relatively long, narrow samples (with some restrictions), while the stationary gradient process is preferred when crystallizing normal to the large face of slab shaped samples. Limitations which constrain both of these gradient crystallization techniques are discussed.",
author = "Birnie, {Dunbar P} and Weinberg, {M. C.}",
year = "1997",
month = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "221",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids",
issn = "0022-3093",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Significance of heterogeneous surface growth in up-gradient and stationary-gradient crystallization

AU - Birnie, Dunbar P

AU - Weinberg, M. C.

PY - 1997/11

Y1 - 1997/11

N2 - Gradient crystallization methods have been proposed and studied for creating microstructures which exhibit crystal orientation. For many of these processes it is possible for spurious heterogeneous nucleation and growth to occur from the sample sides and compete with desired oriented growth. We analyze this growth interference effect for two methods of crystallizing in a temperature gradient: either moving up a temperature gradient, or crystallizing in a stationary temperature gradient. It is demonstrated that the up-gradient technique is mainly suited to relatively long, narrow samples (with some restrictions), while the stationary gradient process is preferred when crystallizing normal to the large face of slab shaped samples. Limitations which constrain both of these gradient crystallization techniques are discussed.

AB - Gradient crystallization methods have been proposed and studied for creating microstructures which exhibit crystal orientation. For many of these processes it is possible for spurious heterogeneous nucleation and growth to occur from the sample sides and compete with desired oriented growth. We analyze this growth interference effect for two methods of crystallizing in a temperature gradient: either moving up a temperature gradient, or crystallizing in a stationary temperature gradient. It is demonstrated that the up-gradient technique is mainly suited to relatively long, narrow samples (with some restrictions), while the stationary gradient process is preferred when crystallizing normal to the large face of slab shaped samples. Limitations which constrain both of these gradient crystallization techniques are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031549707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031549707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 221

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids

JF - Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids

SN - 0022-3093

IS - 1

ER -