The analytical representation of electronic potential-energy surfaces

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

174 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reviews the commonly used methods for representing electronic potential-energy surfaces for small molecules and simple chemical reactions in terms of globally defined analytical functions. Four classes of methods are discussed: spline fitting methods, semiempirical methods, many-body expansion methods, and methods that represent global surfaces based on information determined along reaction paths. The application of these methods is examined in detail for four triatomic systems and one four-atom system: O(P3)+H2, Cl+HCl, H+CO, O(D1)+H2→H2O→OH+H, and H+CO2→OH+CO. These examples illustrate both the art and the pitfalls of representing surfaces. In addition, the consequences of different potential surface representations for the dynamics of collisions on these surfaces are discussed at length.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)669-688
Number of pages20
JournalReviews of Modern Physics
Volume61
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1989

Fingerprint

potential energy
electronics
arts
splines
chemical reactions
collisions
expansion
atoms
molecules

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

The analytical representation of electronic potential-energy surfaces. / Schatz, George C.

In: Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 61, No. 3, 1989, p. 669-688.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f8b20971b2f64640a9d1a285a11b40c4,
title = "The analytical representation of electronic potential-energy surfaces",
abstract = "This article reviews the commonly used methods for representing electronic potential-energy surfaces for small molecules and simple chemical reactions in terms of globally defined analytical functions. Four classes of methods are discussed: spline fitting methods, semiempirical methods, many-body expansion methods, and methods that represent global surfaces based on information determined along reaction paths. The application of these methods is examined in detail for four triatomic systems and one four-atom system: O(P3)+H2, Cl+HCl, H+CO, O(D1)+H2→H2O→OH+H, and H+CO2→OH+CO. These examples illustrate both the art and the pitfalls of representing surfaces. In addition, the consequences of different potential surface representations for the dynamics of collisions on these surfaces are discussed at length.",
author = "Schatz, {George C}",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1103/RevModPhys.61.669",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "669--688",
journal = "Reviews of Modern Physics",
issn = "0034-6861",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The analytical representation of electronic potential-energy surfaces

AU - Schatz, George C

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - This article reviews the commonly used methods for representing electronic potential-energy surfaces for small molecules and simple chemical reactions in terms of globally defined analytical functions. Four classes of methods are discussed: spline fitting methods, semiempirical methods, many-body expansion methods, and methods that represent global surfaces based on information determined along reaction paths. The application of these methods is examined in detail for four triatomic systems and one four-atom system: O(P3)+H2, Cl+HCl, H+CO, O(D1)+H2→H2O→OH+H, and H+CO2→OH+CO. These examples illustrate both the art and the pitfalls of representing surfaces. In addition, the consequences of different potential surface representations for the dynamics of collisions on these surfaces are discussed at length.

AB - This article reviews the commonly used methods for representing electronic potential-energy surfaces for small molecules and simple chemical reactions in terms of globally defined analytical functions. Four classes of methods are discussed: spline fitting methods, semiempirical methods, many-body expansion methods, and methods that represent global surfaces based on information determined along reaction paths. The application of these methods is examined in detail for four triatomic systems and one four-atom system: O(P3)+H2, Cl+HCl, H+CO, O(D1)+H2→H2O→OH+H, and H+CO2→OH+CO. These examples illustrate both the art and the pitfalls of representing surfaces. In addition, the consequences of different potential surface representations for the dynamics of collisions on these surfaces are discussed at length.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000677365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000677365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/RevModPhys.61.669

DO - 10.1103/RevModPhys.61.669

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 669

EP - 688

JO - Reviews of Modern Physics

JF - Reviews of Modern Physics

SN - 0034-6861

IS - 3

ER -