The effect of geometric factors on sodium conduction

A comparison of beta- And beta"-alumina

Emma Kennedy, Dunbar P Birnie

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

β"-alumina has been shown to have superior sodium conduction compared with β-alumina, and therefore is used as the electrolyte material in sodium battery systems. The β"-alumina structure is composed of layers of (111) oriented spinel-structure units separated by conduction planes that are comparably more open allowing for sodium diffusion. The β-alumina structure is similar except that the spinel units are aligned differently creating a smaller and less flexible conduction plane. In addition to being more flexible, β"-alumina is able to absorb stabilizing ions into the spinel unit, whereas β-alumina does not appear to have that capability. In this paper we analyze the differences in these structures that affect sodium conduction. This comparison will assist in understanding the β"-alumina structure and enhancing its capacity for greater conduction of sodium.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCeramic Engineering and Science Proceedings
Pages57-63
Number of pages7
Volume34
Edition9
Publication statusPublished - 2014
EventCeramic Materials for Energy Applications III - 37th International Conference on Advanced Ceramics and Composites, ICACC 2013 - Daytona Beach, FL, United States
Duration: Jan 27 2013Feb 1 2013

Other

OtherCeramic Materials for Energy Applications III - 37th International Conference on Advanced Ceramics and Composites, ICACC 2013
CountryUnited States
CityDaytona Beach, FL
Period1/27/132/1/13

Fingerprint

Aluminum Oxide
Alumina
Sodium
Electrolytes
Ions
spinell

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ceramics and Composites
  • Materials Chemistry

Cite this

Kennedy, E., & Birnie, D. P. (2014). The effect of geometric factors on sodium conduction: A comparison of beta- And beta"-alumina. In Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings (9 ed., Vol. 34, pp. 57-63)

The effect of geometric factors on sodium conduction : A comparison of beta- And beta"-alumina. / Kennedy, Emma; Birnie, Dunbar P.

Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings. Vol. 34 9. ed. 2014. p. 57-63.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Kennedy, E & Birnie, DP 2014, The effect of geometric factors on sodium conduction: A comparison of beta- And beta"-alumina. in Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings. 9 edn, vol. 34, pp. 57-63, Ceramic Materials for Energy Applications III - 37th International Conference on Advanced Ceramics and Composites, ICACC 2013, Daytona Beach, FL, United States, 1/27/13.
Kennedy E, Birnie DP. The effect of geometric factors on sodium conduction: A comparison of beta- And beta"-alumina. In Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings. 9 ed. Vol. 34. 2014. p. 57-63
Kennedy, Emma ; Birnie, Dunbar P. / The effect of geometric factors on sodium conduction : A comparison of beta- And beta"-alumina. Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings. Vol. 34 9. ed. 2014. pp. 57-63
@inproceedings{a3c7501d5c9b452bbe463063af1d9eda,
title = "The effect of geometric factors on sodium conduction: A comparison of beta- And beta{"}-alumina",
abstract = "β{"}-alumina has been shown to have superior sodium conduction compared with β-alumina, and therefore is used as the electrolyte material in sodium battery systems. The β{"}-alumina structure is composed of layers of (111) oriented spinel-structure units separated by conduction planes that are comparably more open allowing for sodium diffusion. The β-alumina structure is similar except that the spinel units are aligned differently creating a smaller and less flexible conduction plane. In addition to being more flexible, β{"}-alumina is able to absorb stabilizing ions into the spinel unit, whereas β-alumina does not appear to have that capability. In this paper we analyze the differences in these structures that affect sodium conduction. This comparison will assist in understanding the β{"}-alumina structure and enhancing its capacity for greater conduction of sodium.",
author = "Emma Kennedy and Birnie, {Dunbar P}",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781118807583",
volume = "34",
pages = "57--63",
booktitle = "Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings",
edition = "9",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - The effect of geometric factors on sodium conduction

T2 - A comparison of beta- And beta"-alumina

AU - Kennedy, Emma

AU - Birnie, Dunbar P

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - β"-alumina has been shown to have superior sodium conduction compared with β-alumina, and therefore is used as the electrolyte material in sodium battery systems. The β"-alumina structure is composed of layers of (111) oriented spinel-structure units separated by conduction planes that are comparably more open allowing for sodium diffusion. The β-alumina structure is similar except that the spinel units are aligned differently creating a smaller and less flexible conduction plane. In addition to being more flexible, β"-alumina is able to absorb stabilizing ions into the spinel unit, whereas β-alumina does not appear to have that capability. In this paper we analyze the differences in these structures that affect sodium conduction. This comparison will assist in understanding the β"-alumina structure and enhancing its capacity for greater conduction of sodium.

AB - β"-alumina has been shown to have superior sodium conduction compared with β-alumina, and therefore is used as the electrolyte material in sodium battery systems. The β"-alumina structure is composed of layers of (111) oriented spinel-structure units separated by conduction planes that are comparably more open allowing for sodium diffusion. The β-alumina structure is similar except that the spinel units are aligned differently creating a smaller and less flexible conduction plane. In addition to being more flexible, β"-alumina is able to absorb stabilizing ions into the spinel unit, whereas β-alumina does not appear to have that capability. In this paper we analyze the differences in these structures that affect sodium conduction. This comparison will assist in understanding the β"-alumina structure and enhancing its capacity for greater conduction of sodium.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891896932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891896932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781118807583

VL - 34

SP - 57

EP - 63

BT - Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings

ER -