The energy future

John Newman, Christopher A. Bonino, James A Trainham

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The foreseeable energy future will be driven by economics of known technologies and the desire to reduce CO2 emissions to the atmosphere. Renewable energy options are compared with each other and with the use of fossil fuels with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). Economic analysis is used to determine the best of several alternatives. One can disagree on the detailed costs, including externalities such as climate change and air and water pollution. But the differences in capital and operating costs between known technologies are so significant that one can draw clear conclusions. Results show that renewable energy cannot compete with fossil fuels on a cost basis alone because energy is intrinsic to the molecule, except for hydroelectricity. However, fossil fuels are implicated in climate change. Using renewable energy exclusively, including transportation and electricity needs, could reduce the standard of living in the United States by 43% to 62%, which would correspond to the level in about 1970. If capture and sequester of CO2 are implemented, the cost of using fossil fuels will increase, but they beat renewable energy handily as an economic way to produce clean energy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-174
Number of pages22
JournalAnnual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Fossil fuels
Climate change
Costs
Hydroelectric power
Carbon capture
Economics
Water pollution
Economic analysis
Air pollution
Operating costs
Electricity
Molecules

Keywords

  • Carbon capture
  • Costs
  • Renewable energy
  • Technoeconomic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Chemical Engineering(all)

Cite this

The energy future. / Newman, John; Bonino, Christopher A.; Trainham, James A.

In: Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vol. 9, 01.01.2018, p. 153-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Newman, John ; Bonino, Christopher A. ; Trainham, James A. / The energy future. In: Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering. 2018 ; Vol. 9. pp. 153-174.
@article{0f7b5f43a31d4df69efe5921a5ee18e2,
title = "The energy future",
abstract = "The foreseeable energy future will be driven by economics of known technologies and the desire to reduce CO2 emissions to the atmosphere. Renewable energy options are compared with each other and with the use of fossil fuels with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). Economic analysis is used to determine the best of several alternatives. One can disagree on the detailed costs, including externalities such as climate change and air and water pollution. But the differences in capital and operating costs between known technologies are so significant that one can draw clear conclusions. Results show that renewable energy cannot compete with fossil fuels on a cost basis alone because energy is intrinsic to the molecule, except for hydroelectricity. However, fossil fuels are implicated in climate change. Using renewable energy exclusively, including transportation and electricity needs, could reduce the standard of living in the United States by 43{\%} to 62{\%}, which would correspond to the level in about 1970. If capture and sequester of CO2 are implemented, the cost of using fossil fuels will increase, but they beat renewable energy handily as an economic way to produce clean energy.",
keywords = "Carbon capture, Costs, Renewable energy, Technoeconomic",
author = "John Newman and Bonino, {Christopher A.} and Trainham, {James A}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060817-084300",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "153--174",
journal = "Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering",
issn = "1947-5438",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The energy future

AU - Newman, John

AU - Bonino, Christopher A.

AU - Trainham, James A

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - The foreseeable energy future will be driven by economics of known technologies and the desire to reduce CO2 emissions to the atmosphere. Renewable energy options are compared with each other and with the use of fossil fuels with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). Economic analysis is used to determine the best of several alternatives. One can disagree on the detailed costs, including externalities such as climate change and air and water pollution. But the differences in capital and operating costs between known technologies are so significant that one can draw clear conclusions. Results show that renewable energy cannot compete with fossil fuels on a cost basis alone because energy is intrinsic to the molecule, except for hydroelectricity. However, fossil fuels are implicated in climate change. Using renewable energy exclusively, including transportation and electricity needs, could reduce the standard of living in the United States by 43% to 62%, which would correspond to the level in about 1970. If capture and sequester of CO2 are implemented, the cost of using fossil fuels will increase, but they beat renewable energy handily as an economic way to produce clean energy.

AB - The foreseeable energy future will be driven by economics of known technologies and the desire to reduce CO2 emissions to the atmosphere. Renewable energy options are compared with each other and with the use of fossil fuels with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). Economic analysis is used to determine the best of several alternatives. One can disagree on the detailed costs, including externalities such as climate change and air and water pollution. But the differences in capital and operating costs between known technologies are so significant that one can draw clear conclusions. Results show that renewable energy cannot compete with fossil fuels on a cost basis alone because energy is intrinsic to the molecule, except for hydroelectricity. However, fossil fuels are implicated in climate change. Using renewable energy exclusively, including transportation and electricity needs, could reduce the standard of living in the United States by 43% to 62%, which would correspond to the level in about 1970. If capture and sequester of CO2 are implemented, the cost of using fossil fuels will increase, but they beat renewable energy handily as an economic way to produce clean energy.

KW - Carbon capture

KW - Costs

KW - Renewable energy

KW - Technoeconomic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049188404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049188404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060817-084300

DO - 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060817-084300

M3 - Review article

VL - 9

SP - 153

EP - 174

JO - Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

JF - Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

SN - 1947-5438

ER -