Time-dependent susceptibility of the growth of gold nanorods to the addition of a cosurfactant

Robert C. Wadams, Laura Fabris, Richard A. Vaia, Kyoungweon Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Gold nanorods have attracted more attention than other gold particle morphologies because of their tunable optical response, which is a product of simply changing the rod's aspect ratio. Advances in bottom-up synthetic methods of gold nanorods have greatly improved yields as well as allowed access to a range of aspect ratios. Despite great strides being made in synthetic methods, the growth mechanism of gold nanorods has been debated in recent years. A recent mechanism outlined by Park et al. shows that nanorods undergo five distinct stages of growth. Stages I and II of this growth mechanism are dominated by the epitaxial micellar adsorption of surfactant to the growing crystal and adatom migration during rod reconstruction, respectively. Both of these processes, occurring early in particle growth, clearly dominate the production of anisotropic species, as well as the resultant morphology. Therefore, our hypothesis is that nanorod growth should be most susceptible to crystal habit modification during early growth stages. In this work, we show that the addition of surfactants, having a structure similar to that of the primary morphology-guiding surfactant, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, during stages I and II of nanorod growth drastically influences the final dimensionality and morphology of nanorods. In contrast, addition after longer periods of time has little or no influence on rod structure. Our results bolster the growth mechanism outlined by Park et al., proving nanorod growth is most susceptible to crystal habit modification during growth stages that are dominated by epitaxial micellar adsorption and adatom reorganization. Furthermore, this work emphasizes the sensitivity of nanorod growth to the existing micellar state of the growth solution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4772-4780
Number of pages9
JournalChemistry of Materials
Volume25
Issue number23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 10 2013

Fingerprint

Nanorods
Gold
Surface-Active Agents
Surface active agents
Adatoms
Aspect ratio
Adsorption
Crystals
Crystal growth

Keywords

  • BDAC
  • cosurfactant
  • CTAB
  • CTAC
  • gold nanorods
  • growth mechanism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Chemistry
  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Chemistry(all)

Cite this

Time-dependent susceptibility of the growth of gold nanorods to the addition of a cosurfactant. / Wadams, Robert C.; Fabris, Laura; Vaia, Richard A.; Park, Kyoungweon.

In: Chemistry of Materials, Vol. 25, No. 23, 10.12.2013, p. 4772-4780.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wadams, Robert C. ; Fabris, Laura ; Vaia, Richard A. ; Park, Kyoungweon. / Time-dependent susceptibility of the growth of gold nanorods to the addition of a cosurfactant. In: Chemistry of Materials. 2013 ; Vol. 25, No. 23. pp. 4772-4780.
@article{5ddcc560bd024641838b2d9a34837532,
title = "Time-dependent susceptibility of the growth of gold nanorods to the addition of a cosurfactant",
abstract = "Gold nanorods have attracted more attention than other gold particle morphologies because of their tunable optical response, which is a product of simply changing the rod's aspect ratio. Advances in bottom-up synthetic methods of gold nanorods have greatly improved yields as well as allowed access to a range of aspect ratios. Despite great strides being made in synthetic methods, the growth mechanism of gold nanorods has been debated in recent years. A recent mechanism outlined by Park et al. shows that nanorods undergo five distinct stages of growth. Stages I and II of this growth mechanism are dominated by the epitaxial micellar adsorption of surfactant to the growing crystal and adatom migration during rod reconstruction, respectively. Both of these processes, occurring early in particle growth, clearly dominate the production of anisotropic species, as well as the resultant morphology. Therefore, our hypothesis is that nanorod growth should be most susceptible to crystal habit modification during early growth stages. In this work, we show that the addition of surfactants, having a structure similar to that of the primary morphology-guiding surfactant, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, during stages I and II of nanorod growth drastically influences the final dimensionality and morphology of nanorods. In contrast, addition after longer periods of time has little or no influence on rod structure. Our results bolster the growth mechanism outlined by Park et al., proving nanorod growth is most susceptible to crystal habit modification during growth stages that are dominated by epitaxial micellar adsorption and adatom reorganization. Furthermore, this work emphasizes the sensitivity of nanorod growth to the existing micellar state of the growth solution.",
keywords = "BDAC, cosurfactant, CTAB, CTAC, gold nanorods, growth mechanism",
author = "Wadams, {Robert C.} and Laura Fabris and Vaia, {Richard A.} and Kyoungweon Park",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1021/cm402863h",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "4772--4780",
journal = "Chemistry of Materials",
issn = "0897-4756",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time-dependent susceptibility of the growth of gold nanorods to the addition of a cosurfactant

AU - Wadams, Robert C.

AU - Fabris, Laura

AU - Vaia, Richard A.

AU - Park, Kyoungweon

PY - 2013/12/10

Y1 - 2013/12/10

N2 - Gold nanorods have attracted more attention than other gold particle morphologies because of their tunable optical response, which is a product of simply changing the rod's aspect ratio. Advances in bottom-up synthetic methods of gold nanorods have greatly improved yields as well as allowed access to a range of aspect ratios. Despite great strides being made in synthetic methods, the growth mechanism of gold nanorods has been debated in recent years. A recent mechanism outlined by Park et al. shows that nanorods undergo five distinct stages of growth. Stages I and II of this growth mechanism are dominated by the epitaxial micellar adsorption of surfactant to the growing crystal and adatom migration during rod reconstruction, respectively. Both of these processes, occurring early in particle growth, clearly dominate the production of anisotropic species, as well as the resultant morphology. Therefore, our hypothesis is that nanorod growth should be most susceptible to crystal habit modification during early growth stages. In this work, we show that the addition of surfactants, having a structure similar to that of the primary morphology-guiding surfactant, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, during stages I and II of nanorod growth drastically influences the final dimensionality and morphology of nanorods. In contrast, addition after longer periods of time has little or no influence on rod structure. Our results bolster the growth mechanism outlined by Park et al., proving nanorod growth is most susceptible to crystal habit modification during growth stages that are dominated by epitaxial micellar adsorption and adatom reorganization. Furthermore, this work emphasizes the sensitivity of nanorod growth to the existing micellar state of the growth solution.

AB - Gold nanorods have attracted more attention than other gold particle morphologies because of their tunable optical response, which is a product of simply changing the rod's aspect ratio. Advances in bottom-up synthetic methods of gold nanorods have greatly improved yields as well as allowed access to a range of aspect ratios. Despite great strides being made in synthetic methods, the growth mechanism of gold nanorods has been debated in recent years. A recent mechanism outlined by Park et al. shows that nanorods undergo five distinct stages of growth. Stages I and II of this growth mechanism are dominated by the epitaxial micellar adsorption of surfactant to the growing crystal and adatom migration during rod reconstruction, respectively. Both of these processes, occurring early in particle growth, clearly dominate the production of anisotropic species, as well as the resultant morphology. Therefore, our hypothesis is that nanorod growth should be most susceptible to crystal habit modification during early growth stages. In this work, we show that the addition of surfactants, having a structure similar to that of the primary morphology-guiding surfactant, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, during stages I and II of nanorod growth drastically influences the final dimensionality and morphology of nanorods. In contrast, addition after longer periods of time has little or no influence on rod structure. Our results bolster the growth mechanism outlined by Park et al., proving nanorod growth is most susceptible to crystal habit modification during growth stages that are dominated by epitaxial micellar adsorption and adatom reorganization. Furthermore, this work emphasizes the sensitivity of nanorod growth to the existing micellar state of the growth solution.

KW - BDAC

KW - cosurfactant

KW - CTAB

KW - CTAC

KW - gold nanorods

KW - growth mechanism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890402229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890402229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/cm402863h

DO - 10.1021/cm402863h

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 4772

EP - 4780

JO - Chemistry of Materials

JF - Chemistry of Materials

SN - 0897-4756

IS - 23

ER -